Watch the Gap: Making code more intelligible to users without sacrificing decentralization?

Simona Ramos, M. Mannan
{"title":"Watch the Gap: Making code more intelligible to users without sacrificing decentralization?","authors":"Simona Ramos, M. Mannan","doi":"10.1109/CBI54897.2022.10059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential for blockchain technology to eliminate the middleman and replace the top-down hierarchical model of governance with a system of distributed cooperation has opened up many new opportunities, as well as dilemmas. Surpassing the level of acceptance by early tech adopters, the market of smart contracts is now moving towards wider acceptance from regular (non-tech) users. For this to happen however, smart contract development will have to overcome certain technical and legal obstacles to bring the code and the user closer. Guided by notions from contract law and consumer protection we highlight the ‘information gap’ that exists between users (including judges/legal bodies) and the source code. We present a spectrum of low-code to no-code initiatives that aim at bridging this gap, promising the potential of higher regulatory acceptance. Nevertheless, this highlights the ‘The Pitfall of the Trustless Dream’, because arguably solutions to the information gap tend to make the system more centralized. In this article, we aim to make a practical contribution of relevance to the wide-spread adoption of smart contracts and their legal acceptance by analyzing the evolving practices that bring the user and the code closer.","PeriodicalId":447040,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI54897.2022.10059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential for blockchain technology to eliminate the middleman and replace the top-down hierarchical model of governance with a system of distributed cooperation has opened up many new opportunities, as well as dilemmas. Surpassing the level of acceptance by early tech adopters, the market of smart contracts is now moving towards wider acceptance from regular (non-tech) users. For this to happen however, smart contract development will have to overcome certain technical and legal obstacles to bring the code and the user closer. Guided by notions from contract law and consumer protection we highlight the ‘information gap’ that exists between users (including judges/legal bodies) and the source code. We present a spectrum of low-code to no-code initiatives that aim at bridging this gap, promising the potential of higher regulatory acceptance. Nevertheless, this highlights the ‘The Pitfall of the Trustless Dream’, because arguably solutions to the information gap tend to make the system more centralized. In this article, we aim to make a practical contribution of relevance to the wide-spread adoption of smart contracts and their legal acceptance by analyzing the evolving practices that bring the user and the code closer.
注意差距:在不牺牲去中心化的情况下,让代码对用户更容易理解?
区块链技术消除中间商,用分布式合作系统取代自上而下的分层治理模式的潜力带来了许多新的机遇,也带来了许多困境。智能合约市场超越了早期技术采用者的接受程度,现在正朝着更广泛地接受普通(非技术)用户的方向发展。然而,要实现这一点,智能合约的开发将必须克服某些技术和法律障碍,使代码和用户更接近。在合同法和消费者保护概念的指导下,我们强调存在于用户(包括法官/法律机构)和源代码之间的“信息鸿沟”。我们提出了一系列低代码到无代码的计划,旨在弥合这一差距,并有望获得更高的监管接受度。然而,这凸显了“无信任梦想的陷阱”,因为有争议的解决信息鸿沟的办法往往会使系统更加集中。在本文中,我们的目标是通过分析使用户和代码更接近的不断发展的实践,为智能合约的广泛采用及其法律接受做出实际贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信