{"title":"Taxonomy of interstate conflicts: is South America a peaceful region?","authors":"Tássio Franchi, E. Migon, R. Villarreal","doi":"10.1590/1981-3821201700020008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding and classifying conflicts is not new. The international scenario is dynamic, adapting to new situations, therefore, periodically it becomes necessary to make an exercise of (re) thinking the realities of interstate conflicts.This article revisits the literature on the taxonomy of interstate conflicts, contrasting it with historical data focused on South America, and thus questions traditional classifications and the argument that the region is peaceful. This study is rooted in the reflection of the main scholars in the field and the contribution of international research institutes dedicated to the subject. Based on such sources, the study seeks a better understanding of the conflicts in South America, identifying their classification in comparison with the dynamics of international conflicts that occurred in the same period. At least, it deals with the widespread interpretation that South America is a peaceful region.Initially, it presents a methodology that attempts, albeit in a limited way, to contribute to a still little explored aspect of the research on Defence. The context is similar to what is seen in the framework of the studies on armed conflict, with the contribution of international relations and political science.Next, the reference literature is reviewed. Two interpretations of interstate conflicts in South America are examined. The first, which is known as 'Long Peace', supports the idea that the region is experiencing a period of prolonged peace, without major tensions and confrontations among the states. This aspect was investigated from two perspectives: the construction of the 'taxonomy of interstate conflicts' and the construction of the theoretical argument of the 'Long Peace in South America'. First, a detailed analysis of different databases dedicated to systematizing and assessing conflicts between states is conducted, which then serves as a support for informing and better understanding the conceptual argument brought to light.The second interpretation is knowns as 'The violent peace and the latent conflicts in South America' in that it admits the existence of a level of intensity not properly grasped by theorists and indicators of the first dimension. Such perspective advances the existence of frozen conflicts among the South American states. It shows evidence that the 'South American long peace' does not necessarily rest on solid a foundation, since frozen conflicts seem to be hidden under classification variables that disregard important historical and geopolitical issues on the South American continent.The present study is based both on theoretical landmarks and empirical elements. The literature review was built from bibliographical research on the following: Battaglino (2012, 2008), Centeno (2002), Child (1985), Kacowicz, (1998), Lopes (2013), Mares (2012, 2001), Martin (2006, 2002), Medeiros Filho (2011, 2010), Pieri (2011), Rudzit (2013), Saint-Pierre (2013, 2011) and Saint-Pierre and Palacios Jr. (2014).The empirical framework was built by mapping databases associated with regional conflicts, namely: 01. Correlates of War (COW), described by Sarkees and Wayman (2010); 02. Military Interstate Dataset (MID), described by Palmer et al. (2015); 03. Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP), described by Pettersson and Wallensteen (2015); and, 04. Conflict with Barometer, from the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research (WANCKE, 2015). The dataset was analyzed with the support of the 'content analysis' technique (BARDIN, 1977), which made it possible to extract the typologies, taxonomies, variables and indicators associated with the study of contemporary armed conflicts.Finally, brief conclusions as well as additional investigation options which can be further explored in future studies are proposed. The perspective of using matrices exogenous to the region, either by the use of external theories or by the use of empirical data not contextualized to the regional reality, hinders a better understanding of the specific dynamics of the subcontinent. …","PeriodicalId":159271,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Political Science Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821201700020008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Understanding and classifying conflicts is not new. The international scenario is dynamic, adapting to new situations, therefore, periodically it becomes necessary to make an exercise of (re) thinking the realities of interstate conflicts.This article revisits the literature on the taxonomy of interstate conflicts, contrasting it with historical data focused on South America, and thus questions traditional classifications and the argument that the region is peaceful. This study is rooted in the reflection of the main scholars in the field and the contribution of international research institutes dedicated to the subject. Based on such sources, the study seeks a better understanding of the conflicts in South America, identifying their classification in comparison with the dynamics of international conflicts that occurred in the same period. At least, it deals with the widespread interpretation that South America is a peaceful region.Initially, it presents a methodology that attempts, albeit in a limited way, to contribute to a still little explored aspect of the research on Defence. The context is similar to what is seen in the framework of the studies on armed conflict, with the contribution of international relations and political science.Next, the reference literature is reviewed. Two interpretations of interstate conflicts in South America are examined. The first, which is known as 'Long Peace', supports the idea that the region is experiencing a period of prolonged peace, without major tensions and confrontations among the states. This aspect was investigated from two perspectives: the construction of the 'taxonomy of interstate conflicts' and the construction of the theoretical argument of the 'Long Peace in South America'. First, a detailed analysis of different databases dedicated to systematizing and assessing conflicts between states is conducted, which then serves as a support for informing and better understanding the conceptual argument brought to light.The second interpretation is knowns as 'The violent peace and the latent conflicts in South America' in that it admits the existence of a level of intensity not properly grasped by theorists and indicators of the first dimension. Such perspective advances the existence of frozen conflicts among the South American states. It shows evidence that the 'South American long peace' does not necessarily rest on solid a foundation, since frozen conflicts seem to be hidden under classification variables that disregard important historical and geopolitical issues on the South American continent.The present study is based both on theoretical landmarks and empirical elements. The literature review was built from bibliographical research on the following: Battaglino (2012, 2008), Centeno (2002), Child (1985), Kacowicz, (1998), Lopes (2013), Mares (2012, 2001), Martin (2006, 2002), Medeiros Filho (2011, 2010), Pieri (2011), Rudzit (2013), Saint-Pierre (2013, 2011) and Saint-Pierre and Palacios Jr. (2014).The empirical framework was built by mapping databases associated with regional conflicts, namely: 01. Correlates of War (COW), described by Sarkees and Wayman (2010); 02. Military Interstate Dataset (MID), described by Palmer et al. (2015); 03. Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP), described by Pettersson and Wallensteen (2015); and, 04. Conflict with Barometer, from the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research (WANCKE, 2015). The dataset was analyzed with the support of the 'content analysis' technique (BARDIN, 1977), which made it possible to extract the typologies, taxonomies, variables and indicators associated with the study of contemporary armed conflicts.Finally, brief conclusions as well as additional investigation options which can be further explored in future studies are proposed. The perspective of using matrices exogenous to the region, either by the use of external theories or by the use of empirical data not contextualized to the regional reality, hinders a better understanding of the specific dynamics of the subcontinent. …
理解和分类冲突并不新鲜。国际形势是动态的,要适应新的形势,因此,有必要定期对国家间冲突的现实进行(重新)思考。本文回顾了关于国家间冲突分类的文献,将其与以南美为中心的历史数据进行了对比,从而质疑了传统的分类和该地区是和平的论点。这项研究植根于该领域主要学者的反思和致力于该主题的国际研究机构的贡献。根据这些资料,本研究力求更好地了解南美洲的冲突,并将其分类与同一时期发生的国际冲突的动态进行比较。至少,它涉及到南美洲是一个和平地区的普遍解释。最初,它提出了一种方法论,尽管以有限的方式,试图为国防研究的一个尚未被探索的方面做出贡献。在国际关系和政治科学的贡献下,其背景与武装冲突研究的框架类似。接下来,对参考文献进行综述。对南美国家间冲突的两种解释进行了考察。第一个被称为“长期和平”,它支持这样一种观点,即该地区正在经历一段长期和平时期,各国之间没有重大紧张局势和对抗。从“国家间冲突分类学”的构建和“南美长期和平”理论论证的构建两个角度对这一问题进行了研究。首先,对不同的数据库进行了详细的分析,这些数据库专门用于系统化和评估国家之间的冲突,然后作为提供信息和更好地理解所揭示的概念论点的支持。第二种解释被称为“南美的暴力和平和潜在冲突”,因为它承认存在着第一个维度的理论家和指标没有正确把握的强度水平。这种观点进一步证明了南美国家之间存在着冰冻冲突。它表明,“南美长期和平”并不一定建立在坚实的基础上,因为冻结的冲突似乎隐藏在分类变量之下,忽视了南美大陆上重要的历史和地缘政治问题。本研究既有理论基础,也有实证基础。文献综述基于以下文献文献研究:Battaglino(2012、2008)、Centeno(2002)、Child(1985)、Kacowicz(1998)、Lopes(2013)、Mares(2012、2001)、Martin(2006、2002)、Medeiros Filho(2011、2010)、Pieri(2011)、Rudzit(2013)、Saint-Pierre(2013、2011)和Saint-Pierre and Palacios Jr.(2014)。通过与地区冲突相关的地图数据库构建实证框架,即:01。Sarkees和Wayman(2010)描述的战争相关性(Correlates of War, COW);02. 军事州际数据集(MID),由Palmer等人(2015)描述;03. 乌普萨拉冲突数据计划(UCDP),由Pettersson和Wallensteen(2015)描述;04。冲突与晴雨表,来自海德堡国际冲突研究所(wanke, 2015)。数据集在“内容分析”技术的支持下进行分析(BARDIN, 1977),这使得提取与当代武装冲突研究相关的类型学、分类法、变量和指标成为可能。最后,提出了简要的结论,并提出了在未来的研究中可以进一步探索的其他调查选项。通过使用外部理论或使用没有结合区域现实的经验数据来使用本区域外部的矩阵的观点,妨碍了更好地了解次大陆的具体动态。...