Micro-entries: Encouraging Deeper Evaluation of Mental Models Over Time for Interactive Data Systems

Jeremy E. Block, E. Ragan
{"title":"Micro-entries: Encouraging Deeper Evaluation of Mental Models Over Time for Interactive Data Systems","authors":"Jeremy E. Block, E. Ragan","doi":"10.1109/BELIV51497.2020.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many interactive data systems combine visual representations of data with embedded algorithmic support for automation and data exploration. To effectively support transparent and explainable data systems, it is important for researchers and designers to know how users understand the system. We discuss the evaluation of users’ mental models of system logic. Mental models are challenging to capture and analyze. While common evaluation methods aim to approximate the user’s final mental model after a period of system usage, user understanding continuously evolves as users interact with a system over time. In this paper, we review many common mental model measurement techniques, discuss tradeoffs, and recommend methods for deeper, more meaningful evaluation of mental models when using interactive data analysis and visualization systems. We present guidelines for evaluating mental models over time to help track the evolution of specific model updates and how they may map to the particular use of interface features and data queries. By asking users to describe what they know and how they know it, researchers can collect structured, time-ordered insight into a user’s conceptualization process while also helping guide users to their own discoveries.","PeriodicalId":282674,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Workshop on Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches to Visualization (BELIV)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Workshop on Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches to Visualization (BELIV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV51497.2020.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Many interactive data systems combine visual representations of data with embedded algorithmic support for automation and data exploration. To effectively support transparent and explainable data systems, it is important for researchers and designers to know how users understand the system. We discuss the evaluation of users’ mental models of system logic. Mental models are challenging to capture and analyze. While common evaluation methods aim to approximate the user’s final mental model after a period of system usage, user understanding continuously evolves as users interact with a system over time. In this paper, we review many common mental model measurement techniques, discuss tradeoffs, and recommend methods for deeper, more meaningful evaluation of mental models when using interactive data analysis and visualization systems. We present guidelines for evaluating mental models over time to help track the evolution of specific model updates and how they may map to the particular use of interface features and data queries. By asking users to describe what they know and how they know it, researchers can collect structured, time-ordered insight into a user’s conceptualization process while also helping guide users to their own discoveries.
微条目:随着时间的推移鼓励对交互数据系统的心理模型进行更深入的评估
许多交互式数据系统将数据的可视化表示与支持自动化和数据探索的嵌入式算法相结合。为了有效地支持透明和可解释的数据系统,研究人员和设计人员必须了解用户如何理解系统。我们讨论了系统逻辑的用户心智模型的评价。捕捉和分析心理模型是一项挑战。虽然常见的评估方法旨在接近用户在使用系统一段时间后的最终心智模型,但随着用户与系统的交互时间的推移,用户的理解也在不断发展。在本文中,我们回顾了许多常见的心理模型测量技术,讨论了权衡,并推荐了在使用交互式数据分析和可视化系统时更深入,更有意义的心理模型评估方法。我们提出了评估心理模型随时间变化的指导方针,以帮助跟踪特定模型更新的演变,以及它们如何映射到接口功能和数据查询的特定使用。通过要求用户描述他们知道什么以及他们是如何知道的,研究人员可以收集结构化的、按时间顺序排列的洞察力,了解用户的概念化过程,同时也帮助指导用户找到自己的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信