An integration team’s diagnosing of context, spanning boundaries and creating psychological safety within a multiteam system

R. Huggins, C. Scheepers
{"title":"An integration team’s diagnosing of context, spanning boundaries and creating psychological safety within a multiteam system","authors":"R. Huggins, C. Scheepers","doi":"10.1108/TPM-12-2018-0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to explore how integration teams can build trusting relationships in component teams to enhance their leadership capability within multiteam systems to achieve common superordinate goals. The study investigates how an integration team diagnoses contextual dynamics to enhance understanding of goals in component teams and spans boundaries to create trusting relationships.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe proposed model was tested by surveying 396 respondents nested within component teams working within five South African manufacturing companies. Structural Equation Modeling was used to analyse the data.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study reveals that by diagnosing the contextual dynamics within a multiteam system and through boundary spanning, an integration team builds trusting relationships, which will, ultimately, enable teams to achieve common superordinate goals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study offers organisations insights into how multiple component teams of different functional disciplines can work effectively towards achieving an overall or common superordinate goal. It offers insights on how to mitigate misalignment challenges by implementing an integration team within the multiteam system context.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nResearch participants were employees within a manufacturing context, which sets this study apart from many previous ones conducted in a simulated environment within a military context. The study investigates building trusting relationships among multiple component teams within a multiteam system through the implementation of an integration team, which has not been specifically addressed in previous studies.\n","PeriodicalId":150524,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2018-0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore how integration teams can build trusting relationships in component teams to enhance their leadership capability within multiteam systems to achieve common superordinate goals. The study investigates how an integration team diagnoses contextual dynamics to enhance understanding of goals in component teams and spans boundaries to create trusting relationships. Design/methodology/approach The proposed model was tested by surveying 396 respondents nested within component teams working within five South African manufacturing companies. Structural Equation Modeling was used to analyse the data. Findings The study reveals that by diagnosing the contextual dynamics within a multiteam system and through boundary spanning, an integration team builds trusting relationships, which will, ultimately, enable teams to achieve common superordinate goals. Practical implications This study offers organisations insights into how multiple component teams of different functional disciplines can work effectively towards achieving an overall or common superordinate goal. It offers insights on how to mitigate misalignment challenges by implementing an integration team within the multiteam system context. Originality/value Research participants were employees within a manufacturing context, which sets this study apart from many previous ones conducted in a simulated environment within a military context. The study investigates building trusting relationships among multiple component teams within a multiteam system through the implementation of an integration team, which has not been specifically addressed in previous studies.
集成团队对上下文的诊断,跨越边界,在多团队系统中创造心理安全
目的本研究旨在探讨整合团队如何在组件团队中建立信任关系,以提升组件团队在多团队系统中的领导能力,以达成共同的上级目标。本研究调查了集成团队如何诊断上下文动态以增强对组件团队目标的理解,并跨越边界以建立信任关系。设计/方法/方法通过调查在五家南非制造公司的组件团队中嵌套的396名受访者来测试所提出的模型。采用结构方程模型对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,通过诊断多团队系统中的上下文动态并通过边界跨越,集成团队建立了信任关系,这将最终使团队能够实现共同的上级目标。实际意义本研究为组织提供了不同职能学科的多个组成团队如何有效地工作以实现总体或共同的上级目标的见解。它提供了关于如何通过在多团队系统上下文中实现集成团队来减轻不一致挑战的见解。独创性/价值研究的参与者是制造业背景下的员工,这使得这项研究与之前在军事背景下的模拟环境中进行的许多研究不同。本研究探讨了通过集成团队的实施,在多团队系统中的多个组件团队之间建立信任关系,这在以前的研究中没有具体解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信