Thinking Outside the Bus: Revitalizing the Role of a Teacher's Standard of Care During After-School Hours

Jeffrey M. Delman
{"title":"Thinking Outside the Bus: Revitalizing the Role of a Teacher's Standard of Care During After-School Hours","authors":"Jeffrey M. Delman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3327527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A staggering 14 million school children are left unaccompanied every afternoon on America’s elementary, middle, and high school campuses. While some loiter around waiting for a parent to pick them up, still others wait for a ride home after finishing up an athletic practice or music rehearsal later into the evening. When something goes wrong and an unsupervised child ends up injuring themselves or damaging property during after-school hours, who is responsible? Is the school liable for not monitoring these students or do parents bear the burden of making sure their child arrives home safely and out of trouble? Such questions have few answers from a compulsory education system wrought with nationwide inconsistencies, contradictory jurisprudence, and one-sided immunity practices. In its present condition, this custodial blame game does little to make after-school environments safer for America’s schoolchildren.<br><br>Fortunately, a legislative opportunity to clarify these liability concerns will immensely benefit teachers, parents, and students alike. In my analysis, I present an original catalogue of state education codes that offers insight into the best practices of how states handle the delicate transition of custodial powers from school to parent. A unique cross section of case law accompanies that catalogue to further examine how our country’s legal system has attempted to rectify such uncertainty in the past. While the topic of after-school liability has often gone unreported and unresolved in many of America’s courts and state houses, a brave few have taken up the issue, and the solution is clear: model legislation must be drafted to provide a standardized approach that benefits students everywhere. <br><br>The model legislation I propose includes (1) an elevated professional standard for teachers monitoring campuses after school, (2) bright-line education code that requires school districts statewide to adhere to standardized language, and (3) recommendations for schools to better engage their local communities in hopes of offering clear solutions for getting kids home safely. Alongside such model legislation is a practical analysis of the resources involved in such reform, and an acknowledgement that much of the infrastructure already exists to make this solution a practical reality. In the end, our school children deserve clearly defined practices determining who has supervisory liability upon the conclusion of the school day. <br>","PeriodicalId":402063,"journal":{"name":"Education Law eJournal","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3327527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A staggering 14 million school children are left unaccompanied every afternoon on America’s elementary, middle, and high school campuses. While some loiter around waiting for a parent to pick them up, still others wait for a ride home after finishing up an athletic practice or music rehearsal later into the evening. When something goes wrong and an unsupervised child ends up injuring themselves or damaging property during after-school hours, who is responsible? Is the school liable for not monitoring these students or do parents bear the burden of making sure their child arrives home safely and out of trouble? Such questions have few answers from a compulsory education system wrought with nationwide inconsistencies, contradictory jurisprudence, and one-sided immunity practices. In its present condition, this custodial blame game does little to make after-school environments safer for America’s schoolchildren.

Fortunately, a legislative opportunity to clarify these liability concerns will immensely benefit teachers, parents, and students alike. In my analysis, I present an original catalogue of state education codes that offers insight into the best practices of how states handle the delicate transition of custodial powers from school to parent. A unique cross section of case law accompanies that catalogue to further examine how our country’s legal system has attempted to rectify such uncertainty in the past. While the topic of after-school liability has often gone unreported and unresolved in many of America’s courts and state houses, a brave few have taken up the issue, and the solution is clear: model legislation must be drafted to provide a standardized approach that benefits students everywhere.

The model legislation I propose includes (1) an elevated professional standard for teachers monitoring campuses after school, (2) bright-line education code that requires school districts statewide to adhere to standardized language, and (3) recommendations for schools to better engage their local communities in hopes of offering clear solutions for getting kids home safely. Alongside such model legislation is a practical analysis of the resources involved in such reform, and an acknowledgement that much of the infrastructure already exists to make this solution a practical reality. In the end, our school children deserve clearly defined practices determining who has supervisory liability upon the conclusion of the school day.
在公共汽车外思考:在课后时间重振教师护理标准的作用
每天下午,在美国的小学、初中和高中校园里,无人陪伴的学生人数达到了惊人的1400万。当一些人闲逛等待父母来接他们的时候,还有一些人在晚上完成体育练习或音乐排练后等着搭车回家。如果出了问题,一个无人看管的孩子在放学后伤害了自己或损坏了财产,谁来负责?学校是否有责任不监督这些学生,或者家长是否有责任确保他们的孩子安全回家并摆脱麻烦?这样的问题在全国范围内不一致的义务教育制度、相互矛盾的法理学和片面的豁免实践中几乎没有答案。在目前的情况下,这种监护式的指责游戏对让美国学生的课后环境更安全没有什么帮助。幸运的是,一个立法的机会来澄清这些责任问题,将极大地有利于教师、家长和学生。在我的分析中,我提供了一份州教育法规的原始目录,提供了对各州如何处理从学校到家长的监护权微妙过渡的最佳实践的见解。该目录附带了一个独特的判例法横截面,以进一步研究我国的法律制度过去是如何试图纠正这种不确定性的。尽管课后责任的话题在美国的许多法院和州议会中经常没有被报道和解决,但少数勇敢的人已经开始讨论这个问题,解决办法很明确:必须起草示范立法,提供一种标准化的方法,使各地的学生受益。我提议的示范立法包括:(1)提高教师放学后监控校园的专业标准;(2)明确的教育法规,要求全州的学区坚持使用标准化的语言;(3)建议学校更好地与当地社区接触,希望能提供明确的解决方案,让孩子们安全回家。除了这种模式立法之外,还对这种改革所涉及的资源进行了实际分析,并承认已经存在许多基础设施,可以使这种解决方案成为现实。最后,我们的学生应该有明确的做法来确定谁在放学后负有监督责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信