A Comparative Technical, Cost and Profit Efficiency Analysis of Australian, Canadian and UK Banks: Feasible Efficiency Improvements in the Context of Controllable and Uncontrollable Factors

D. Xiang, Abul Shamsuddin, A. Worthington
{"title":"A Comparative Technical, Cost and Profit Efficiency Analysis of Australian, Canadian and UK Banks: Feasible Efficiency Improvements in the Context of Controllable and Uncontrollable Factors","authors":"D. Xiang, Abul Shamsuddin, A. Worthington","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1914094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper employs a mixed two-stage approach to estimate and explain differences in the cross-country efficiency of ten Australian, five UK and eight Canadian banks over the period 1988 to 2008 using stochastic distance, cost and profit frontiers. The variables specified in the stochastic frontiers used to estimate efficiency include the amount and prices of labour, physical capital and deposits, along with the level of non-interest income, profits and total costs. The country and firm-specific variables specified as explanatory factors include per capita national income, capital adequacy, deposit density, the industry concentration ratio, the level of intangible assets, and ratios of provisions for loan losses-to-total loans, loans-to-deposits, debt-to-equity, loans-to-total assets and long-term debt-to-total capital, among many others. In line with the experience of the banking sector during the recent global finance crisis, the evidence indicates that Australian banks exhibit superior efficiency compared with their Canadian and UK counterparts. Key factors found to affect efficiency positively include the level of intangible assets and the loans-to-deposits and loans-to-assets ratios. In contrast, key factors found to affect efficiency negatively include bank size and the ratios of loan loss provisions-to-total loans and the debt-to-equity ratio.","PeriodicalId":331246,"journal":{"name":"24th Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2011 (Archive)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"24th Australasian Finance & Banking Conference 2011 (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1914094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper employs a mixed two-stage approach to estimate and explain differences in the cross-country efficiency of ten Australian, five UK and eight Canadian banks over the period 1988 to 2008 using stochastic distance, cost and profit frontiers. The variables specified in the stochastic frontiers used to estimate efficiency include the amount and prices of labour, physical capital and deposits, along with the level of non-interest income, profits and total costs. The country and firm-specific variables specified as explanatory factors include per capita national income, capital adequacy, deposit density, the industry concentration ratio, the level of intangible assets, and ratios of provisions for loan losses-to-total loans, loans-to-deposits, debt-to-equity, loans-to-total assets and long-term debt-to-total capital, among many others. In line with the experience of the banking sector during the recent global finance crisis, the evidence indicates that Australian banks exhibit superior efficiency compared with their Canadian and UK counterparts. Key factors found to affect efficiency positively include the level of intangible assets and the loans-to-deposits and loans-to-assets ratios. In contrast, key factors found to affect efficiency negatively include bank size and the ratios of loan loss provisions-to-total loans and the debt-to-equity ratio.
澳大利亚、加拿大和英国银行技术效率、成本效率和利润效率的比较分析:可控和不可控因素背景下可行的效率提升
本文采用混合两阶段方法来估计和解释1988年至2008年期间10家澳大利亚、5家英国和8家加拿大银行的跨国效率差异,使用随机距离、成本和利润边界。用于估计效率的随机边界中指定的变量包括劳动力、实物资本和存款的数量和价格,以及非利息收入、利润和总成本的水平。指定为解释因素的国家和公司特定变量包括人均国民收入、资本充足率、存款密度、行业集中度、无形资产水平、贷款损失拨备与总贷款、贷款与存款、债务与权益、贷款与总资产和长期债务与总资本的比率等等。根据最近全球金融危机期间银行业的经验,有证据表明,与加拿大和英国的同行相比,澳大利亚的银行表现出更高的效率。发现对效率有积极影响的关键因素包括无形资产水平、存贷比和贷资产比。相比之下,发现对效率产生负面影响的关键因素包括银行规模和贷款损失准备金与总贷款的比率以及债务权益比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信