Qualitative analysis of deep learning frameworks

M. Gutoski, L. T. Hattori, Nelson Marcelo Romero Aquino, H. C. Senefonte, Manassés Ribeiro, A. Lazzaretti, H. S. Lopes
{"title":"Qualitative analysis of deep learning frameworks","authors":"M. Gutoski, L. T. Hattori, Nelson Marcelo Romero Aquino, H. C. Senefonte, Manassés Ribeiro, A. Lazzaretti, H. S. Lopes","doi":"10.21528/lnlm-vol15-no1-art3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Deep learning methods are becoming more popular for complex pattern recognition applications. As result, many frameworks have appeared aiming to facilitate the development of such applications. However, choosing a suitable framework may not be an easy task for new users. In this paper, a qualitative evaluation of four of the most popular Deep Learning frameworks is provided, including: Caffe, Torch, Lasagne and TensorFlow. A printed character recognition task was used as case study, and a Convolutional Neural Network was implemented for this purpose. The analysis focus on issues that are important for the development process and encompasses nine qualitative dimensions, showing the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. It is expected that this analysis can be useful for guiding new users in the area.","PeriodicalId":386768,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Nonlinear Models","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Nonlinear Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21528/lnlm-vol15-no1-art3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

– Deep learning methods are becoming more popular for complex pattern recognition applications. As result, many frameworks have appeared aiming to facilitate the development of such applications. However, choosing a suitable framework may not be an easy task for new users. In this paper, a qualitative evaluation of four of the most popular Deep Learning frameworks is provided, including: Caffe, Torch, Lasagne and TensorFlow. A printed character recognition task was used as case study, and a Convolutional Neural Network was implemented for this purpose. The analysis focus on issues that are important for the development process and encompasses nine qualitative dimensions, showing the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. It is expected that this analysis can be useful for guiding new users in the area.
深度学习框架的定性分析
-深度学习方法在复杂模式识别应用中越来越受欢迎。因此,出现了许多旨在促进此类应用程序开发的框架。然而,对于新用户来说,选择一个合适的框架可能不是一件容易的事情。在本文中,提供了四个最流行的深度学习框架的定性评估,包括:Caffe, Torch, Lasagne和TensorFlow。以一个打印字符识别任务为例进行了研究,并为此实现了卷积神经网络。分析集中在对开发过程很重要的问题上,并包含九个定性维度,显示每个框架的优点和缺点。预计这一分析将有助于指导该领域的新用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信