Influencing workforce engagement using ad hoc team huddles

Donald Chrusciel
{"title":"Influencing workforce engagement using ad hoc team huddles","authors":"Donald Chrusciel","doi":"10.1108/tlo-10-2022-0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the benefits of monitoring and enhancing engagement to impact the overall effectiveness and future success by using the combination of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale along with a daily employee vote to trigger an appropriate ad hoc huddle that can be proactive in addressing any engagement issues.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA fieldwork case study is used to examine engagement interventions based upon the use of a trigger (daily vote) and the overall impact is measured with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.\n\n\nFindings\nAll indications from this study are that the ad hoc gatherings triggered by the daily vote do have a favorable impact on workforce engagement. This effect was measured by doing a Utrecht Work Engagement Scale survey at the beginning of the pilot followed by another a year later. The results presented in this case appear to show that a learning organization can have an impact on the engagement culture of the workforce if desired.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nRecognizing that the sample size is small, a longitudinal study of over a year was done to help mitigate the concerns of such a small sample size. The reader is cautioned about extrapolating these findings beyond this study without appropriate considerations.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis research provides evidence which aided the organization during the changing times in using interventions, ad hoc gatherings to improve workforce engagement. These interventions are triggered by using a timely lagging indicator, a daily log which serves as a monitor of workforce engagement for the benefit of the organization and the employee.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study uses two methods to measure and track workforce engagement. The known Utrecht Work Engagement Scale is used to determine the impact of the ad hoc huddles and to determine whether this intervention has a favorable impact on workforce engagement. The use of these two methods helps to spark continued interest to not only monitor but also to help identify the interest in using a timely indicator to determine when an intervention may be warranted.\n","PeriodicalId":365387,"journal":{"name":"The Learning Organization","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Learning Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-10-2022-0120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the benefits of monitoring and enhancing engagement to impact the overall effectiveness and future success by using the combination of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale along with a daily employee vote to trigger an appropriate ad hoc huddle that can be proactive in addressing any engagement issues. Design/methodology/approach A fieldwork case study is used to examine engagement interventions based upon the use of a trigger (daily vote) and the overall impact is measured with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Findings All indications from this study are that the ad hoc gatherings triggered by the daily vote do have a favorable impact on workforce engagement. This effect was measured by doing a Utrecht Work Engagement Scale survey at the beginning of the pilot followed by another a year later. The results presented in this case appear to show that a learning organization can have an impact on the engagement culture of the workforce if desired. Research limitations/implications Recognizing that the sample size is small, a longitudinal study of over a year was done to help mitigate the concerns of such a small sample size. The reader is cautioned about extrapolating these findings beyond this study without appropriate considerations. Practical implications This research provides evidence which aided the organization during the changing times in using interventions, ad hoc gatherings to improve workforce engagement. These interventions are triggered by using a timely lagging indicator, a daily log which serves as a monitor of workforce engagement for the benefit of the organization and the employee. Originality/value This study uses two methods to measure and track workforce engagement. The known Utrecht Work Engagement Scale is used to determine the impact of the ad hoc huddles and to determine whether this intervention has a favorable impact on workforce engagement. The use of these two methods helps to spark continued interest to not only monitor but also to help identify the interest in using a timely indicator to determine when an intervention may be warranted.
利用特别的团队会议影响员工的参与度
本文旨在通过结合乌得勒支工作敬业度量表和每日员工投票来触发适当的临时会议,以积极主动地解决任何敬业度问题,研究监控和提高敬业度对整体有效性和未来成功的影响。设计/方法/方法实地工作案例研究用于检查基于触发器(每日投票)使用的敬业干预措施,并使用乌得勒支工作敬业量表测量总体影响。研究结果本研究的所有迹象都表明,由日常投票引发的临时聚会确实对员工敬业度产生了有利影响。这种效果是通过在试点开始时进行乌得勒支工作投入量表调查来衡量的,一年后又进行了一次调查。本案例的结果似乎表明,如果需要,学习型组织可以对员工的敬业文化产生影响。研究的局限性/意义认识到样本量很小,我们进行了一年多的纵向研究,以帮助减轻这样一个小样本量的担忧。读者被警告在没有适当考虑的情况下推断这些研究结果。实际意义本研究提供了证据,帮助组织在不断变化的时代使用干预措施,特别聚会来提高员工敬业度。这些干预措施是通过使用及时的滞后指标来触发的,这是一种日常日志,可以作为员工敬业度的监控,从而为组织和员工带来好处。独创性/价值本研究使用两种方法来衡量和跟踪员工敬业度。已知的乌得勒支工作敬业度量表用于确定临时会议的影响,并确定这种干预是否对员工敬业度产生有利影响。这两种方法的使用不仅有助于激发人们对监测的持续兴趣,而且有助于识别人们对使用及时指标来确定何时有必要进行干预的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信