GEOMETRIC THINKING LEVELS OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE SULTANATE OF OMAN

Salim Mohammed Said AL MAMARI
{"title":"GEOMETRIC THINKING LEVELS OF MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE SULTANATE OF OMAN","authors":"Salim Mohammed Said AL MAMARI","doi":"10.47832/2757-5403.18.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to identifying geometric thinking levels of 8th grade students of Middle School in the Sultanate of Oman, and the significance of statistical differences in geometric thinking according to the gender variable. The sample of the study consisted of (136) students from the schools of the General Directorate of Education in Al Dhahirah Governorate. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher applied the geometric thinking test to the study sample. The results showed a low level of geometric thinking of the study sample, as (17.65%) of the sample did not exceed the visual level, while (55.88%) of the sample was classified on the first visual level, (17.65%) of the sample was on the analytical level, and (2.94%) of the sample was on the semi-inductive level. The results also showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the geometric thinking test between males and females in favor of the female sample. This may be due to the difference in teaching practices and employment Teaching aids in teaching geometric subjects, and the researcher recommends the importance of training mathematics teachers to design educational activities based on Van Hill levels of geometric thinking.","PeriodicalId":182370,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","volume":"10 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.18.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to identifying geometric thinking levels of 8th grade students of Middle School in the Sultanate of Oman, and the significance of statistical differences in geometric thinking according to the gender variable. The sample of the study consisted of (136) students from the schools of the General Directorate of Education in Al Dhahirah Governorate. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher applied the geometric thinking test to the study sample. The results showed a low level of geometric thinking of the study sample, as (17.65%) of the sample did not exceed the visual level, while (55.88%) of the sample was classified on the first visual level, (17.65%) of the sample was on the analytical level, and (2.94%) of the sample was on the semi-inductive level. The results also showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the geometric thinking test between males and females in favor of the female sample. This may be due to the difference in teaching practices and employment Teaching aids in teaching geometric subjects, and the researcher recommends the importance of training mathematics teachers to design educational activities based on Van Hill levels of geometric thinking.
阿曼苏丹国中学生几何思维水平研究
本研究旨在确定阿曼苏丹国中学八年级学生的几何思维水平,并根据性别变量分析几何思维的统计差异的显著性。这项研究的样本包括来自Al Dhahirah省教育总局学校的(136)名学生。为了达到研究的目的,研究者对研究样本进行了几何思维测试。结果表明,研究样本的几何思维水平较低,(17.65%)的样本未超过视觉水平,(55.88%)的样本属于第一视觉水平,(17.65%)的样本属于分析水平,(2.94%)的样本属于半感性水平。结果还表明,几何思维测试在男性和女性之间存在统计学上的显著差异,有利于女性样本。这可能是由于几何学科教学实践和就业教具的差异,研究人员建议培训数学教师根据Van Hill几何思维水平设计教育活动的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信