Comparing the Predictability of Sensor Modalities to Detect Stress from Wearable Sensor Data

Ryan Holder, Ramesh Kumar Sah, M. Cleveland, Hassan Ghasemzadeh
{"title":"Comparing the Predictability of Sensor Modalities to Detect Stress from Wearable Sensor Data","authors":"Ryan Holder, Ramesh Kumar Sah, M. Cleveland, Hassan Ghasemzadeh","doi":"10.1109/CCNC49033.2022.9700682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting stress from wearable sensor data enables those struggling with unhealthy stress coping mechanisms to better manage their stress. Previous studies have investigated how mechanisms for detecting stress from sensor data can be optimized, comparing alternative algorithms and approaches to find the best possible outcome. One strategy to make these mechanisms more accessible is to reduce the number of sensors that wearable devices must support. Reducing the number of sensors will enable wearable devices to be a smaller size, require less battery, and last longer, making use of these wearable devices more accessible. To progress towards this more convenient stress detection mechanism, we investigate how learning algorithms perform on singular modalities and compare the outcome with results from multiple modalities. We found that singular modalities performed comparably or better than combined modalities on two stress-detection datasets, suggesting that there is promise for detecting stress with fewer sensor requirements. From the four modalities we tested, acceleration, blood volume pulse, and electrodermal activity, we saw acceleration and electrodermal activity to stand out in a few cases, but all modalities showed potential. Our results are acquired from testing with random holdout and leave-one-subject-out validation, using several machine learning techniques. Our results can inspire work on optimizing stress detection with singular modalities to make the benefits of these detection mechanisms more convenient.","PeriodicalId":269305,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 19th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 19th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC49033.2022.9700682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Detecting stress from wearable sensor data enables those struggling with unhealthy stress coping mechanisms to better manage their stress. Previous studies have investigated how mechanisms for detecting stress from sensor data can be optimized, comparing alternative algorithms and approaches to find the best possible outcome. One strategy to make these mechanisms more accessible is to reduce the number of sensors that wearable devices must support. Reducing the number of sensors will enable wearable devices to be a smaller size, require less battery, and last longer, making use of these wearable devices more accessible. To progress towards this more convenient stress detection mechanism, we investigate how learning algorithms perform on singular modalities and compare the outcome with results from multiple modalities. We found that singular modalities performed comparably or better than combined modalities on two stress-detection datasets, suggesting that there is promise for detecting stress with fewer sensor requirements. From the four modalities we tested, acceleration, blood volume pulse, and electrodermal activity, we saw acceleration and electrodermal activity to stand out in a few cases, but all modalities showed potential. Our results are acquired from testing with random holdout and leave-one-subject-out validation, using several machine learning techniques. Our results can inspire work on optimizing stress detection with singular modalities to make the benefits of these detection mechanisms more convenient.
比较可穿戴传感器数据中检测应力的传感器模式的可预测性
从可穿戴传感器数据中检测压力,使那些与不健康的压力应对机制作斗争的人能够更好地管理压力。以前的研究已经研究了如何从传感器数据中检测应力的机制可以优化,比较替代算法和方法,以找到最好的可能结果。使这些机制更易于使用的一个策略是减少可穿戴设备必须支持的传感器数量。减少传感器的数量将使可穿戴设备的尺寸更小,需要更少的电池,使用寿命更长,使这些可穿戴设备更容易使用。为了实现这种更方便的应力检测机制,我们研究了学习算法在单模态上的表现,并将结果与多模态的结果进行了比较。我们发现,在两个应力检测数据集上,单一模态的表现与组合模态相当或更好,这表明用更少的传感器检测应力是有希望的。从我们测试的四种模式,加速,血容量脉冲和皮电活动中,我们看到加速和皮电活动在少数情况下突出,但所有模式都显示出潜力。我们的结果是通过使用几种机器学习技术进行随机保留和留一个主体验证的测试获得的。我们的研究结果可以启发优化奇异模态应力检测的工作,使这些检测机制的好处更方便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信