Checklist-Based Inspection Technique for Feature Models Review

R. Mello, E. Teixeira, Marcelo Schots, C. Werner, G. Travassos
{"title":"Checklist-Based Inspection Technique for Feature Models Review","authors":"R. Mello, E. Teixeira, Marcelo Schots, C. Werner, G. Travassos","doi":"10.1109/SBCARS.2012.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software Product Line Engineering aims to ensure the correctness, completeness and consistency among its artifacts and the specified domain, in order to prevent the spread of defects for the products derived from this domain. Among initial artifacts of a software product line, feature models are artifacts generated in various domain engineering approaches. Although software inspection is highlighted as an effective review activity for detection of defects in software artifacts, mainly in the early models of software projects, a recent quasi-systematic review of literature indicated a lack of techniques to support the inspection of software product line artifacts, which include features models. Thus, this paper presents FMCheck, a checklist-based inspection technique to support the detection of defects on feature models. This technique was developed to be configurable and to be applied on several extensions of the original feature model notation presented by FODA approach, including the Odyssey-FEX notation, in particular. FMCheck was submitted to a proof of concept and to a further in vitro feasibility study, in which it could be seen the feasibility of FMCheck application and also that inspections applying FMCheck are more effective than ad-hoc inspections, when applied on four distinct domains.","PeriodicalId":229350,"journal":{"name":"2012 Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures and Reuse","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Sixth Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures and Reuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBCARS.2012.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Software Product Line Engineering aims to ensure the correctness, completeness and consistency among its artifacts and the specified domain, in order to prevent the spread of defects for the products derived from this domain. Among initial artifacts of a software product line, feature models are artifacts generated in various domain engineering approaches. Although software inspection is highlighted as an effective review activity for detection of defects in software artifacts, mainly in the early models of software projects, a recent quasi-systematic review of literature indicated a lack of techniques to support the inspection of software product line artifacts, which include features models. Thus, this paper presents FMCheck, a checklist-based inspection technique to support the detection of defects on feature models. This technique was developed to be configurable and to be applied on several extensions of the original feature model notation presented by FODA approach, including the Odyssey-FEX notation, in particular. FMCheck was submitted to a proof of concept and to a further in vitro feasibility study, in which it could be seen the feasibility of FMCheck application and also that inspections applying FMCheck are more effective than ad-hoc inspections, when applied on four distinct domains.
基于检查表的特征模型检查技术
软件产品线工程旨在确保其工件与指定领域之间的正确性、完整性和一致性,以防止从该领域派生的产品的缺陷蔓延。在软件产品线的初始工件中,特征模型是在各种领域工程方法中生成的工件。尽管软件检查被强调为一种有效的检查活动,用于检测软件工件中的缺陷,主要是在软件项目的早期模型中,但是最近对文献的一项准系统的检查表明缺乏支持检查软件产品线工件的技术,其中包括特征模型。因此,本文提出了FMCheck,一种基于检查表的检测技术来支持特征模型上的缺陷检测。该技术被开发为可配置的,并应用于FODA方法提出的原始特征模型表示法的几个扩展,特别是奥德赛- fex表示法。FMCheck提交了概念验证和进一步的体外可行性研究,其中可以看到FMCheck应用的可行性,并且应用FMCheck的检查在四个不同的领域应用时比临时检查更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信