ENERGY-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN: NEEDS OF ENERGY DAMAGE INDEX VALUES FOR SERVICEABILITY AND ULTIMATE LIMIT STATES FOR GRAVITY DESIGN BUILDINGS?

C. Negulescu, K. Wijesundara
{"title":"ENERGY-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN: NEEDS OF ENERGY DAMAGE INDEX VALUES FOR SERVICEABILITY AND ULTIMATE LIMIT STATES FOR GRAVITY DESIGN BUILDINGS?","authors":"C. Negulescu, K. Wijesundara","doi":"10.7712/120119.7079.19379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the past earthquakes, different low ductile failure modes are observed in the gravity design structures and thus, the most of existing damage indices may fail to assess the damage of gravity design structures accurately in referring to the two main performance levels: immediate occupancy and ultimate limit state. Therefore, this study investigates the energy dissipated by the brittle structures and the possible damage indices based on energy for the damage assessment of gravity design frames. In the framework of an Energy-Based Seismic Design Approach, we need the assessment of the Demand and on the Capacity, both expressed in Energy. A methodology for the assessment of the seismic energy demands imposed on structures is already proposed, but not such methodology that makes consensus is proposed for the calculation of the Energy dissipation Capacity avoiding the Hysteretic models. The estimation of the energy expended by the building during an earthquake excitation is a tricky issue. For this purpose, this study considers the wavelet based energy estimation and compares it with different approaches for measuring the damages of a structure: the dominant inelastic period of a building and the more classical measure, the inter-story drift. IDA analysis are performed in energy, drift and inelastic period. Furthermore, the damage assessment results based on the expended energy for three gravity design buildings are compared and discussed relatively to the results expressed in inelastic period and drift. Finally, this study concludes that no significant effects of number of inelastic cycles to the damage assessment results for low ductile structures. However, this study also highlights the effects of number of inelastic cycles to the damage for medium and high ductile structures.","PeriodicalId":414988,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015)","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7712/120119.7079.19379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

During the past earthquakes, different low ductile failure modes are observed in the gravity design structures and thus, the most of existing damage indices may fail to assess the damage of gravity design structures accurately in referring to the two main performance levels: immediate occupancy and ultimate limit state. Therefore, this study investigates the energy dissipated by the brittle structures and the possible damage indices based on energy for the damage assessment of gravity design frames. In the framework of an Energy-Based Seismic Design Approach, we need the assessment of the Demand and on the Capacity, both expressed in Energy. A methodology for the assessment of the seismic energy demands imposed on structures is already proposed, but not such methodology that makes consensus is proposed for the calculation of the Energy dissipation Capacity avoiding the Hysteretic models. The estimation of the energy expended by the building during an earthquake excitation is a tricky issue. For this purpose, this study considers the wavelet based energy estimation and compares it with different approaches for measuring the damages of a structure: the dominant inelastic period of a building and the more classical measure, the inter-story drift. IDA analysis are performed in energy, drift and inelastic period. Furthermore, the damage assessment results based on the expended energy for three gravity design buildings are compared and discussed relatively to the results expressed in inelastic period and drift. Finally, this study concludes that no significant effects of number of inelastic cycles to the damage assessment results for low ductile structures. However, this study also highlights the effects of number of inelastic cycles to the damage for medium and high ductile structures.
基于能量的地震设计:重力设计建筑的可用性和极限状态的能量损伤指标值的需求?
在以往的地震中,由于重力设计结构存在不同的低延性破坏模式,现有的损伤指标大多不能准确评价重力设计结构的直接占用和极限状态两个主要性能水平。因此,本文研究了脆性结构的能量耗散和基于能量的可能损伤指标,用于重力设计框架的损伤评估。在基于能量的抗震设计方法框架中,我们需要对需求和能力进行评估,两者都以能量表示。已经提出了一种评估结构的地震能量需求的方法,但对于避免迟滞模型的能量耗散能力的计算没有提出这样的方法。估计建筑物在地震激发时所消耗的能量是一个棘手的问题。为此,本研究考虑了基于小波的能量估计,并将其与测量结构损伤的不同方法进行了比较:建筑物的主要非弹性时期和更经典的测量方法,层间漂移。在能量、漂移和非弹性周期进行了IDA分析。在此基础上,对3种重力设计建筑的损伤评估结果与非弹性周期和漂移计算结果进行了比较和讨论。最后,本研究得出非弹性循环次数对低延性结构损伤评估结果没有显著影响的结论。然而,本研究也强调了非弹性循环次数对中高延性结构损伤的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信