Mandatory audit of financial statements: Does agricultural sector differ from others?

Maja Kljajić, Vule Mizdraković, M. Milojević
{"title":"Mandatory audit of financial statements: Does agricultural sector differ from others?","authors":"Maja Kljajić, Vule Mizdraković, M. Milojević","doi":"10.5937/ekopolj2102407k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this paper is to determine if there are any differences when it comes to the type of opinion and content of audit reports between agricultural and other public companies (non-agricultural). Research sample consists of 398 public companies, and this number makes up about 70% of the total number of public companies listed on the Belgrade Stock Exchange. The sample was divided into two groups; one comprising companies from the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector (29); while the second group consists of public companies from other sectors (369). The research results indicate that companies in the first group received unqualified auditor's opinions more often than second group companies. The similarity between the first and the second group is the dominant use of auditing services of domestic companies with an average share of 64.70% compared to the international and Big 4 auditing companies.","PeriodicalId":201477,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika poljoprivrede","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika poljoprivrede","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopolj2102407k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to determine if there are any differences when it comes to the type of opinion and content of audit reports between agricultural and other public companies (non-agricultural). Research sample consists of 398 public companies, and this number makes up about 70% of the total number of public companies listed on the Belgrade Stock Exchange. The sample was divided into two groups; one comprising companies from the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector (29); while the second group consists of public companies from other sectors (369). The research results indicate that companies in the first group received unqualified auditor's opinions more often than second group companies. The similarity between the first and the second group is the dominant use of auditing services of domestic companies with an average share of 64.70% compared to the international and Big 4 auditing companies.
财务报表的强制审计:农业部门与其他部门不同吗?
本文的主要目的是确定农业和其他上市公司(非农业)在审计报告的意见类型和内容方面是否存在差异。研究样本包括398家上市公司,这一数字约占贝尔格莱德证券交易所上市公司总数的70%。样本被分为两组;一个由农业、林业和渔业部门的公司组成(29个);第二类是其他行业的上市公司(369家)。研究结果表明,第一组公司收到不合格审计意见的频率高于第二组公司。第一组和第二组之间的相似之处在于国内公司主要使用审计服务,与国际和四大审计公司相比,国内公司的平均份额为64.70%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信