IN SEARCH OF THE “MECHANISMS” OF PERSISTENCE OF SUBJECTIVITY: MINIMAL SELF AND AGENCY

Ivan Mlinar
{"title":"IN SEARCH OF THE “MECHANISMS” OF PERSISTENCE OF SUBJECTIVITY: MINIMAL SELF AND AGENCY","authors":"Ivan Mlinar","doi":"10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-2-502-515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th is paper aims to analyze neuropsychiatric pathological experiences (as thought insertion and delusions of control) in which features intrinsic to subjectivity are deeply aff ected to the extent that the fi rst-person perspective is lost, an essential core of the subjective condition. Th e distinction between the sense of agency and the sense of ownership is addressed, in particular in the context of unbidden thoughts and thought insertion. A gradualist reading of the distinction is suggested, and the problem of phenomenological adequacy of the sense of agency for thoughts is raised. Descriptive arguments are provided to show what a minimal self consists of and how it is possible that it does not get lost in extreme neuro- and psycho-pathologies, including a puzzling phenomenon such as terminal lucidity, the case in which an unexpected return of mental clarity and memory take place shortly before death in patients suff ering from severe psychiatric and neurologic disorders. Based on these phenomena it is suggested that subjectivity may be underlain by some ‘mechanisms’ diff erent from those usually assigned by neuroscientifi c models of normal brains. Finally, the challenges that emerge both for neurology and for phenomenological analysis are set out, opening new paths for the research and comprehension of subjectivity.","PeriodicalId":305533,"journal":{"name":"HORIZON / Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija/ STUDIEN ZUR PHÄNOMENOLOGIE / STUDIES IN PHENOMENOLOGY / ÉTUDES PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIQUES","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HORIZON / Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija/ STUDIEN ZUR PHÄNOMENOLOGIE / STUDIES IN PHENOMENOLOGY / ÉTUDES PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIQUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-2-502-515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Th is paper aims to analyze neuropsychiatric pathological experiences (as thought insertion and delusions of control) in which features intrinsic to subjectivity are deeply aff ected to the extent that the fi rst-person perspective is lost, an essential core of the subjective condition. Th e distinction between the sense of agency and the sense of ownership is addressed, in particular in the context of unbidden thoughts and thought insertion. A gradualist reading of the distinction is suggested, and the problem of phenomenological adequacy of the sense of agency for thoughts is raised. Descriptive arguments are provided to show what a minimal self consists of and how it is possible that it does not get lost in extreme neuro- and psycho-pathologies, including a puzzling phenomenon such as terminal lucidity, the case in which an unexpected return of mental clarity and memory take place shortly before death in patients suff ering from severe psychiatric and neurologic disorders. Based on these phenomena it is suggested that subjectivity may be underlain by some ‘mechanisms’ diff erent from those usually assigned by neuroscientifi c models of normal brains. Finally, the challenges that emerge both for neurology and for phenomenological analysis are set out, opening new paths for the research and comprehension of subjectivity.
寻找主体性持续的“机制”:最小的自我和代理
本文旨在分析神经精神病理经验(如思想插入和控制妄想),其中主体性的内在特征受到深刻影响,以至于第一人称视角失去了,这是主观条件的基本核心。讨论了代理意识和所有权意识之间的区别,特别是在未被邀请的思想和思想插入的背景下。对于这种区别,我们提出了一种渐进的解读,并提出了思想代理感的现象学充分性问题。书中提供了描述性的论据来说明最小自我是由什么组成的,以及它如何可能不会迷失在极端的神经和心理病理中,包括一种令人费解的现象,比如终极清醒,在这种情况下,患有严重精神和神经疾病的病人在临死前不久突然恢复了精神清晰度和记忆力。基于这些现象,我们认为主观性可能是由一些不同于通常由正常大脑的神经科学模型所分配的“机制”所支撑的。最后,提出了神经学和现象学分析所面临的挑战,为研究和理解主体性开辟了新的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信