Using a situated knowledge lens to reveal knowledge gains for community partners engaged with a university – community partnership

L. Hardwick, Lindsey Metcalf
{"title":"Using a situated knowledge lens to reveal knowledge gains for community partners engaged with a university – community partnership","authors":"L. Hardwick, Lindsey Metcalf","doi":"10.3351/ppp.2020.6752799995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the types of knowledge gained by community partners working with social science students on the Interchange Programme: a university – community partnership that adopts features of Participatory Action Research and critical pedagogy. The paper draws on a qualitative study with sixteen community partners from the voluntary sector and interprets the findings through a situated knowledge lens. The research reveals the strong influence the policy environment has on driving community partners to look outward to such partnerships. In turn, this frame influences their understanding of knowledge gained in terms of its usefulness in supporting their organisations to adapt to the external policy environment, particularly austerity measures. Glimpses of a more critical understanding related to the injustices faced by the sixteen community partners’ service users are also revealed, facilitated by the programme’s participatory approach. Although the study is small-scale and perspectives of the community partners temporally located and context-driven, it has wider implications for other university-community partnerships concerned to support voluntary community organisations in their local community.","PeriodicalId":162475,"journal":{"name":"People, Place and Policy Online","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People, Place and Policy Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.2020.6752799995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the types of knowledge gained by community partners working with social science students on the Interchange Programme: a university – community partnership that adopts features of Participatory Action Research and critical pedagogy. The paper draws on a qualitative study with sixteen community partners from the voluntary sector and interprets the findings through a situated knowledge lens. The research reveals the strong influence the policy environment has on driving community partners to look outward to such partnerships. In turn, this frame influences their understanding of knowledge gained in terms of its usefulness in supporting their organisations to adapt to the external policy environment, particularly austerity measures. Glimpses of a more critical understanding related to the injustices faced by the sixteen community partners’ service users are also revealed, facilitated by the programme’s participatory approach. Although the study is small-scale and perspectives of the community partners temporally located and context-driven, it has wider implications for other university-community partnerships concerned to support voluntary community organisations in their local community.
使用一个定位的知识镜头来揭示与大学-社区合作伙伴关系的社区伙伴的知识收益
本文考察了社区合作伙伴与社会科学专业学生在交流项目上合作所获得的知识类型:一种采用参与式行动研究和批判性教学法特征的大学-社区合作伙伴关系。本文借鉴了与来自志愿部门的16个社区合作伙伴进行的定性研究,并通过情境知识视角解释了研究结果。研究表明,政策环境对推动社区伙伴向外寻求这种伙伴关系具有强大的影响。反过来,这一框架影响了他们对所获得的知识的理解,因为这些知识有助于他们的组织适应外部政策环境,特别是紧缩措施。在方案的参与性方法的推动下,还揭示了对16个社区伙伴的服务使用者所面临的不公正现象的更为批判性的理解。虽然这项研究是小规模的,社区合作伙伴的观点是暂时的,并且是由环境驱动的,但它对其他大学-社区合作伙伴关系有更广泛的影响,可以支持当地社区的志愿社区组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信