Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking Through Multi-Voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates

C. Brentnall, Iván Diego Rodríguez, N. Culkin
{"title":"Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking Through Multi-Voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates","authors":"C. Brentnall, Iván Diego Rodríguez, N. Culkin","doi":"10.1108/s2040-724620199b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demand for including enterprise in the education system, at all levels and for all pupils is now a global phenomenon. Within this context, the use of competitions and competitive learning activities is presented as a popular and effective vehicle for learning. The purpose of this chapter is to illustrate how a realist method of enquiry – which utilises theory as the unit of analysis – can shed new light on the assumed and unintended outcomes of enterprise education competitions. The case developed here is that there are inherent flaws in assuming that competitions will ‘work’ in the ways set out in policy and guidance. Some of the most prevalent stated outcomes – that competitions will motivate and reward young people, that they will enable the development of entrepreneurial skills, and that learners will be inspired by their peers – are challenged by theory from psychology and education. The issue at stake is that the expansion of enterprise education policy into primary and secondary education increases the likelihood that more learners will be sheep dipped in competitions, and competitive activities, without a clear recognition of the potential unintended effects. In this chapter, we employ a realist-informed approach to critically evaluate the theoretical basis that underpins the use of competitions Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking through Multi-voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, Volume 9A, 25–48 Copyright © 2019 by Emerald Publishing Limited All rights of reproduction in any form reserved ISSN: 2040-7246/doi:10.1108/S2040-72462018000009A002 D ow nl oa de d by P ro fe ss or N ig el C ul ki n A t 0 3: 27 0 5 D ec em be r 20 18 ( PT ) 26 CATHERINE BRENTNALL ET AL. and competitive learning activities in school-based enterprise education. We believe that our findings and subsequent recommendations will provide those who promote and practice the use of competitions with a richer, more sophisticated picture of the potential flaws within such activities.","PeriodicalId":256635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s2040-724620199b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The demand for including enterprise in the education system, at all levels and for all pupils is now a global phenomenon. Within this context, the use of competitions and competitive learning activities is presented as a popular and effective vehicle for learning. The purpose of this chapter is to illustrate how a realist method of enquiry – which utilises theory as the unit of analysis – can shed new light on the assumed and unintended outcomes of enterprise education competitions. The case developed here is that there are inherent flaws in assuming that competitions will ‘work’ in the ways set out in policy and guidance. Some of the most prevalent stated outcomes – that competitions will motivate and reward young people, that they will enable the development of entrepreneurial skills, and that learners will be inspired by their peers – are challenged by theory from psychology and education. The issue at stake is that the expansion of enterprise education policy into primary and secondary education increases the likelihood that more learners will be sheep dipped in competitions, and competitive activities, without a clear recognition of the potential unintended effects. In this chapter, we employ a realist-informed approach to critically evaluate the theoretical basis that underpins the use of competitions Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking through Multi-voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, Volume 9A, 25–48 Copyright © 2019 by Emerald Publishing Limited All rights of reproduction in any form reserved ISSN: 2040-7246/doi:10.1108/S2040-72462018000009A002 D ow nl oa de d by P ro fe ss or N ig el C ul ki n A t 0 3: 27 0 5 D ec em be r 20 18 ( PT ) 26 CATHERINE BRENTNALL ET AL. and competitive learning activities in school-based enterprise education. We believe that our findings and subsequent recommendations will provide those who promote and practice the use of competitions with a richer, more sophisticated picture of the potential flaws within such activities.
创造创业空间:多方对话,对新兴辩论的反思
将企业纳入各级教育系统和所有学生的需求现在是一种全球现象。在这种背景下,使用竞赛和竞争性学习活动是一种流行和有效的学习手段。本章的目的是说明现实主义的调查方法——它利用理论作为分析单位——如何揭示企业教育竞争的假设和意外结果。这里的情况是,假设竞争将以政策和指导中规定的方式“运作”,存在固有的缺陷。一些最普遍的陈述结果——竞赛将激励和奖励年轻人,它们将使创业技能的发展成为可能,学习者将受到同龄人的启发——受到心理学和教育理论的挑战。问题的关键在于,将企业教育政策扩展到中小学教育,增加了更多学习者在竞争和竞争活动中沦为牺牲品的可能性,而没有明确认识到潜在的意想不到的影响。在本章中,我们采用现实主义的方法来批判性地评估支持使用竞赛的理论基础:创造创业空间:通过多种声音交谈,对新兴辩论的反思创业研究中的当代问题,第9A卷,25-48版权所有©2019 by Emerald Publishing Limited[2040-7246] [doi:10.1108/S2040-72462018000009A002] [j] .中国大学学报(自然科学版)[j] . 2008 (PT) 26] CATHERINE BRENTNALL等。校本企业教育中竞争性学习活动的研究。]我们相信,我们的发现和随后的建议将为那些推广和实践竞争的人提供一个更丰富、更复杂的关于此类活动潜在缺陷的图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信