Comparison of Non-Destructive Examination Techniques for Crack Inspection

Axel Aulin, K. Shahzad, R. MacKenzie, S. Bott
{"title":"Comparison of Non-Destructive Examination Techniques for Crack Inspection","authors":"Axel Aulin, K. Shahzad, R. MacKenzie, S. Bott","doi":"10.1115/IPC2020-9508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Effective and efficient crack management programs for liquids pipelines require consistent, high quality non-destructive examination (NDE) to allow validation of crack in-line inspection (ILI) results. Enbridge leveraged multiple NDE techniques on a 26-inch flash-welded pipe as part of a crack management program. This line is challenging to inspect given the presence of irregular geometry of the weld. In addition, the majority of the flaws are located on the internal surface, so buffing to obtain accurate measurements in the ditch is not possible. As such, to ensure a robust validation of crack ILI performance on the line, phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT), time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD), and a full matrix capture (FMC) technology were all used as part of the validation dig program.\n PAUT and FMC were used on most of the flaws characterized as part of the dig program providing a relatively large data set for further analysis. Encoded scans on the flash welded long seam weld were collected in the ditch and additional analyses were performed off-site to characterize and size the flaws. Buff-sizing where possible and coupon cutouts were selected and completed to assist with providing an additional source of truth. Secondary review of results by an NDE specialist improved the quality of the results and identified locations for rescanning due to data quality concerns. Physical defect examinations completed after destructive testing of sample coupon cutouts were utilized to generate a correlation between the actual defect size from fracture surface observation and the field measurements using various NDE methods.\n This paper will review the findings from the program, including quality-related learnings implemented into standard NDE procedures as well as comparisons of detection and sizing from each methodology. Finally, a summary of the benefits and limitations of each technique based on the experience from a challenging inspection program will be summarized.","PeriodicalId":273758,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Effective and efficient crack management programs for liquids pipelines require consistent, high quality non-destructive examination (NDE) to allow validation of crack in-line inspection (ILI) results. Enbridge leveraged multiple NDE techniques on a 26-inch flash-welded pipe as part of a crack management program. This line is challenging to inspect given the presence of irregular geometry of the weld. In addition, the majority of the flaws are located on the internal surface, so buffing to obtain accurate measurements in the ditch is not possible. As such, to ensure a robust validation of crack ILI performance on the line, phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT), time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD), and a full matrix capture (FMC) technology were all used as part of the validation dig program. PAUT and FMC were used on most of the flaws characterized as part of the dig program providing a relatively large data set for further analysis. Encoded scans on the flash welded long seam weld were collected in the ditch and additional analyses were performed off-site to characterize and size the flaws. Buff-sizing where possible and coupon cutouts were selected and completed to assist with providing an additional source of truth. Secondary review of results by an NDE specialist improved the quality of the results and identified locations for rescanning due to data quality concerns. Physical defect examinations completed after destructive testing of sample coupon cutouts were utilized to generate a correlation between the actual defect size from fracture surface observation and the field measurements using various NDE methods. This paper will review the findings from the program, including quality-related learnings implemented into standard NDE procedures as well as comparisons of detection and sizing from each methodology. Finally, a summary of the benefits and limitations of each technique based on the experience from a challenging inspection program will be summarized.
裂纹无损检测技术的比较
有效和高效的液体管道裂缝管理方案需要一致的、高质量的无损检测(NDE)来验证裂缝在线检测(ILI)结果。作为裂缝管理计划的一部分,Enbridge在26英寸的闪光焊管上使用了多种无损检测技术。考虑到焊缝的不规则几何形状,这条线很难检查。此外,大多数缺陷位于内表面,因此在沟槽中抛光以获得精确的测量是不可能的。因此,为了确保裂纹ILI性能的可靠验证,相控阵超声测试(PAUT)、飞行时间衍射(TOFD)和全矩阵捕获(FMC)技术都被用作验证挖掘程序的一部分。PAUT和FMC用于大多数缺陷,这些缺陷是挖掘程序的一部分,为进一步分析提供了相对较大的数据集。在沟槽中收集了闪焊长缝焊缝的编码扫描,并在现场进行了额外的分析,以确定缺陷的特征和尺寸。在可能的情况下,选择并完成抛光尺寸和优惠券切割,以帮助提供额外的真相来源。NDE专家对结果的二次评审提高了结果的质量,并确定了由于数据质量问题而需要重新扫描的位置。在对样品接头切割进行破坏性测试后完成的物理缺陷检查,利用各种无损检测方法在裂缝表面观察到的实际缺陷尺寸与现场测量结果之间建立了相关性。本文将回顾该项目的研究结果,包括实施到标准NDE程序中的与质量相关的学习,以及对每种方法的检测和规模的比较。最后,将根据具有挑战性的检查程序的经验总结每种技术的优点和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信