How good are deterministic models for analyzing congestion control in delayed stochastic networks?

Ioannis Lestas, G. Vinnicombe
{"title":"How good are deterministic models for analyzing congestion control in delayed stochastic networks?","authors":"Ioannis Lestas, G. Vinnicombe","doi":"10.1109/CDC.2004.1429596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the regime where instability in deterministic fluid flow models for congestion control analysis in data networks corresponds to a significant increase in the variance of the flow in stochastic networks. This is shown to be the case when there are large number of packets in flight with small queue thresholds. The analysis is carried out by modelling an M/M/1 queue with delayed feedback as a stochastic hybrid system and analyzing the transient probability distribution of the states with partial differential equations. We also introduce a deterministic nonlinear dynamic queue model that captures the dynamics of the stochastic feedback system. Most of the literature on congestion control analysis using deterministic models, is currently based on queueing models that are valid in one of the extreme cases of negligible queueing delays relative to propagation delays (these are modelled with static functions) or never emptying queues (modelled as integrators). The proposed model is shown to be valid both in these extreme conditions, as well as intermediate regimes of large delays, emptying queues and significant queue dynamics.","PeriodicalId":254457,"journal":{"name":"2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2004.1429596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We investigate the regime where instability in deterministic fluid flow models for congestion control analysis in data networks corresponds to a significant increase in the variance of the flow in stochastic networks. This is shown to be the case when there are large number of packets in flight with small queue thresholds. The analysis is carried out by modelling an M/M/1 queue with delayed feedback as a stochastic hybrid system and analyzing the transient probability distribution of the states with partial differential equations. We also introduce a deterministic nonlinear dynamic queue model that captures the dynamics of the stochastic feedback system. Most of the literature on congestion control analysis using deterministic models, is currently based on queueing models that are valid in one of the extreme cases of negligible queueing delays relative to propagation delays (these are modelled with static functions) or never emptying queues (modelled as integrators). The proposed model is shown to be valid both in these extreme conditions, as well as intermediate regimes of large delays, emptying queues and significant queue dynamics.
确定性模型在分析延迟随机网络中的拥塞控制方面有多好?
我们研究了数据网络中用于拥塞控制分析的确定性流体流动模型的不稳定性与随机网络中流量方差的显著增加相对应的情况。当有大量数据包在运行,而队列阈值很小时,就会出现这种情况。将具有延迟反馈的M/M/1队列建模为随机混合系统,用偏微分方程分析其状态的暂态概率分布。我们还引入了一个确定的非线性动态队列模型,该模型捕捉了随机反馈系统的动态。大多数关于使用确定性模型的拥塞控制分析的文献,目前都是基于排队模型,这些模型在相对于传播延迟可以忽略的排队延迟(这些是用静态函数建模的)或从不清空队列(建模为积分器)的极端情况下是有效的。所提出的模型在这些极端条件下以及大延迟、空队列和显著队列动态的中间状态下都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信