Modelling and simulation study of CO2 capturing process in coal fired power plant using various amine solvents

Basudeb Munshi, S. Panda, Arvind Kumar
{"title":"Modelling and simulation study of CO2 capturing process in coal fired power plant using various amine solvents","authors":"Basudeb Munshi, S. Panda, Arvind Kumar","doi":"10.32438/wpe.5919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present world, Scientists are very much concern on to reduce the concentration level of carbon dioxide in environment to save the world. In the present work, the CO2 capturing efficiencies of three different amine solvents were analyzed. The selected solvents were mono-ethanol amine (MEA), solvent containing mixture of methyl diethanol amine (MDEA) and piperazine (PZ) called activated -MDEA and aqueous ammonia (NH3) solution. Rigorous simulation method was considered in the current study. The effects of different key parameters for different solvents on the CO2 removal efficiency were analyzed. Packing height, solvent temperature and absorber height were the significant influential parameters for MEA system whereas for activated-MDEA (a-MDEA), those are the ratio of the solvent to feed quantity and the mixed solvent PZ concentration level. For aqueous NH3 solution, absorber and stripper’s temperature, CO2 loading, concentration of NH3, height of the absorber, lean and rich solvent flow rate, boil up ratio, regeneration energy, temperature of the condenser, and duty of the reboiler were considered. The comparative study showed that MEA process recovered the maximum CO2 from flue gas. But it was suffered by the maximum regeneration duty. a-MDEA with PZ recovered 91% CO2. Overall, technically, a-MDEA was the best choice as solvent. Compared to a-MDEA and MEA, aqueous ammonia was identified as more propitious and environment friendly solvent due to its satisfactory performance and easy availability.","PeriodicalId":177785,"journal":{"name":"WEENTECH Proceedings in Energy","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WEENTECH Proceedings in Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32438/wpe.5919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present world, Scientists are very much concern on to reduce the concentration level of carbon dioxide in environment to save the world. In the present work, the CO2 capturing efficiencies of three different amine solvents were analyzed. The selected solvents were mono-ethanol amine (MEA), solvent containing mixture of methyl diethanol amine (MDEA) and piperazine (PZ) called activated -MDEA and aqueous ammonia (NH3) solution. Rigorous simulation method was considered in the current study. The effects of different key parameters for different solvents on the CO2 removal efficiency were analyzed. Packing height, solvent temperature and absorber height were the significant influential parameters for MEA system whereas for activated-MDEA (a-MDEA), those are the ratio of the solvent to feed quantity and the mixed solvent PZ concentration level. For aqueous NH3 solution, absorber and stripper’s temperature, CO2 loading, concentration of NH3, height of the absorber, lean and rich solvent flow rate, boil up ratio, regeneration energy, temperature of the condenser, and duty of the reboiler were considered. The comparative study showed that MEA process recovered the maximum CO2 from flue gas. But it was suffered by the maximum regeneration duty. a-MDEA with PZ recovered 91% CO2. Overall, technically, a-MDEA was the best choice as solvent. Compared to a-MDEA and MEA, aqueous ammonia was identified as more propitious and environment friendly solvent due to its satisfactory performance and easy availability.
不同胺类溶剂对燃煤电厂CO2捕集过程的建模与仿真研究
在当今世界,科学家们非常关注如何降低环境中二氧化碳的浓度来拯救世界。在本工作中,分析了三种不同胺溶剂的CO2捕集效率。溶剂选择为单乙醇胺(MEA)、甲基二乙醇胺(MDEA)和哌嗪(PZ)混合溶剂(活化-MDEA)和氨水(NH3)溶液。本研究采用了严格的仿真方法。分析了不同溶剂的关键参数对CO2去除率的影响。填料高度、溶剂温度和吸收塔高度是影响MEA体系的主要参数,而对活化mdea (a-MDEA)体系影响最大的是溶剂进料比和混合溶剂PZ浓度。对于NH3水溶液,考虑了吸收塔和汽提塔温度、CO2负荷、NH3浓度、吸收塔高度、贫溶剂和富溶剂流速、沸腾比、再生能量、冷凝器温度和再沸器负荷。对比研究表明,MEA工艺从烟气中回收的CO2最多。但它遭受了最大的再生责任。采用PZ的a-MDEA回收了91%的CO2。总的来说,从技术上讲,a-MDEA是溶剂的最佳选择。与a-MDEA和MEA相比,氨水因其良好的性能和易于获得性而被认为是更有利和环保的溶剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信