Combined Video and Ultrasonic Measurements for Fracture Diagnostics – Greater Than the Sum of the Parts

T. Tymons, Glyn Roberts, D. Troup
{"title":"Combined Video and Ultrasonic Measurements for Fracture Diagnostics – Greater Than the Sum of the Parts","authors":"T. Tymons, Glyn Roberts, D. Troup","doi":"10.2118/212322-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Downhole imaging technology has been widely utilized in recent years to help diagnose proppant distribution during hydraulic fracturing operations. Abrasion leading to entry hole enlargement provides strong evidence of proppant placement into individual perforations, and treatment volume can be inferred by measuring the magnitude of this erosion. Results from individual perforations are easily aggregated to cluster and stage level to provide information on overall treatment distribution.\n Two different technologies have been deployed for this purpose – an array of downhole video cameras able to capture a full 360 view of the borehole and, more recently, multi-transducer ultrasonic instruments. These services have been considered competitors, and arguments for and against both technologies have included their relative measurement resolutions and how this impacts result accuracy, along with sensitivity to ‘stick and slip’ effects on toolstring motion. Both technologies are also affected to differing degrees by the well fluid and the presence of diverters and proppant in perforations. The recent introduction of a toolstring able to simultaneously acquire images from both sensor types affords the opportunity to objectively compare results acquired under identical conditions and establish their merits and limitations.\n The paper considers the underlying physical principles of each of the measurements and reviews in detail the real world results from North American wells that have been logged using both technologies.\n The aim of the paper is to provide a more complete understanding of the technologies involved, and how they can be viewed as complementary rather than competitive when they are run simultaneously, allowing potential users to make fully informed decisions on when, why and how to deploy them. We will also demonstrate how the information derived from simultaneous application is of greater value than that derived from the individual technologies in isolation, and how this can be applied to further enhance completion design and frac execution for unconventional wells.","PeriodicalId":402242,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, February 01, 2023","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, February 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212322-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Downhole imaging technology has been widely utilized in recent years to help diagnose proppant distribution during hydraulic fracturing operations. Abrasion leading to entry hole enlargement provides strong evidence of proppant placement into individual perforations, and treatment volume can be inferred by measuring the magnitude of this erosion. Results from individual perforations are easily aggregated to cluster and stage level to provide information on overall treatment distribution. Two different technologies have been deployed for this purpose – an array of downhole video cameras able to capture a full 360 view of the borehole and, more recently, multi-transducer ultrasonic instruments. These services have been considered competitors, and arguments for and against both technologies have included their relative measurement resolutions and how this impacts result accuracy, along with sensitivity to ‘stick and slip’ effects on toolstring motion. Both technologies are also affected to differing degrees by the well fluid and the presence of diverters and proppant in perforations. The recent introduction of a toolstring able to simultaneously acquire images from both sensor types affords the opportunity to objectively compare results acquired under identical conditions and establish their merits and limitations. The paper considers the underlying physical principles of each of the measurements and reviews in detail the real world results from North American wells that have been logged using both technologies. The aim of the paper is to provide a more complete understanding of the technologies involved, and how they can be viewed as complementary rather than competitive when they are run simultaneously, allowing potential users to make fully informed decisions on when, why and how to deploy them. We will also demonstrate how the information derived from simultaneous application is of greater value than that derived from the individual technologies in isolation, and how this can be applied to further enhance completion design and frac execution for unconventional wells.
用于断裂诊断的综合视频和超声波测量-大于各部分之和
近年来,井下成像技术被广泛应用于水力压裂作业中,以帮助诊断支撑剂的分布。磨损导致进入孔扩大,这为支撑剂进入单个射孔提供了强有力的证据,并且可以通过测量这种侵蚀的大小来推断处理量。单个射孔的结果很容易汇总到射孔簇和射孔段水平,从而提供总体处理分布的信息。为了实现这一目的,已经部署了两种不同的技术,一种是能够捕捉井眼360度全景的井下摄像机阵列,另一种是最近使用的多换能器超声波仪器。这些服务一直被认为是竞争对手,支持和反对这两种技术的争论包括它们的相对测量分辨率,以及它们对结果精度的影响,以及对工具串运动的“粘滑”影响的敏感性。这两种技术都不同程度地受到井筒流体以及射孔中暂堵剂和支撑剂的影响。最近引入的一种工具串能够同时从两种传感器获取图像,从而有机会客观地比较在相同条件下获得的结果,并确定它们的优点和局限性。本文考虑了每种测量方法的基本物理原理,并详细回顾了使用这两种技术的北美井的实际结果。本文的目的是提供对所涉及的技术的更全面的理解,以及当它们同时运行时,如何将它们视为互补而不是竞争,从而允许潜在用户就何时、为何以及如何部署它们做出充分知情的决定。我们还将展示如何同时应用获得的信息比孤立的单个技术获得的信息更有价值,以及如何将其应用于进一步提高非常规井的完井设计和压裂执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信