FX Markets Move on Surprise News Institutional Investor Trading Behavior Around Brexit, the US Election, and the Swiss Franc Floor

Kanav Bhagat, Diana Farrell
{"title":"FX Markets Move on Surprise News Institutional Investor Trading Behavior Around Brexit, the US Election, and the Swiss Franc Floor","authors":"Kanav Bhagat, Diana Farrell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3198368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this JPMorgan Chase Institute report, we examined three recent events that had significant impacts on foreign exchange (FX) markets: the decision by the Swiss National Bank to end their minimum exchange rate policy on January 15, 2015, the Brexit referendum on June 23, 2016, and the US Presidential Election on November 8, 2016. All three events shared one important quality — they had unexpected outcomes that led to the largest one-day moves in the relevant exchange rates in the last 20 years — that made them ideal candidates for research aimed at building a better understanding of institutional investor trading behavior. With this research objective in mind, we examined institutional investor trades in FX markets in the days and hours leading up to, during, and after each event. First, we find that FX trading volumes for hedge funds, asset managers, and banks spiked during the three events. In contrast, volumes for the corporate, pension/insurance, and public/other investor sectors barely increased. Second, institutional investors traded significant amounts of FX risk during the events, but their net flows alone cannot explain the sharp exchange rate movements during the repricing periods. Third, only hedge funds consistently transferred risk immediately after news broke and as currencies repriced sharply. Other investors transferred risk but only after exchange rates stabilized. Fourth, the active investor sectors played different roles in each event: During the SNB event, they all bought CHF, trading in the direction of the prevailing move in exchange rates; during the Brexit event their net flows were mixed; and during the US Election event they bought MXN, trading against the prevailing move in exchange rates. Fifth, within each investor sector, there was considerable variation in trading behavior during each event. Finally, banks and hedge funds traded higher volumes outside of their normal business hours and outside of a currency’s local market; other investor sectors did not. Our results are informative for policy discussions along two dimensions: financial market stability and central bank communications. The report leverages a new data asset that includes nearly 400 million institutional investor transactions across all asset classes, sourced from the Markets division of J.P. Morgan’s Corporate & Investment Bank. The analysis in this report is based on 120,000 spot and forward FX transactions in Swiss Francs (CHF), the Pound sterling (GBP), or the Mexican Peso (MXN) that were executed in the hours before, during, and after news broke for each event.","PeriodicalId":381709,"journal":{"name":"ERN: International Finance (Topic)","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: International Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3198368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this JPMorgan Chase Institute report, we examined three recent events that had significant impacts on foreign exchange (FX) markets: the decision by the Swiss National Bank to end their minimum exchange rate policy on January 15, 2015, the Brexit referendum on June 23, 2016, and the US Presidential Election on November 8, 2016. All three events shared one important quality — they had unexpected outcomes that led to the largest one-day moves in the relevant exchange rates in the last 20 years — that made them ideal candidates for research aimed at building a better understanding of institutional investor trading behavior. With this research objective in mind, we examined institutional investor trades in FX markets in the days and hours leading up to, during, and after each event. First, we find that FX trading volumes for hedge funds, asset managers, and banks spiked during the three events. In contrast, volumes for the corporate, pension/insurance, and public/other investor sectors barely increased. Second, institutional investors traded significant amounts of FX risk during the events, but their net flows alone cannot explain the sharp exchange rate movements during the repricing periods. Third, only hedge funds consistently transferred risk immediately after news broke and as currencies repriced sharply. Other investors transferred risk but only after exchange rates stabilized. Fourth, the active investor sectors played different roles in each event: During the SNB event, they all bought CHF, trading in the direction of the prevailing move in exchange rates; during the Brexit event their net flows were mixed; and during the US Election event they bought MXN, trading against the prevailing move in exchange rates. Fifth, within each investor sector, there was considerable variation in trading behavior during each event. Finally, banks and hedge funds traded higher volumes outside of their normal business hours and outside of a currency’s local market; other investor sectors did not. Our results are informative for policy discussions along two dimensions: financial market stability and central bank communications. The report leverages a new data asset that includes nearly 400 million institutional investor transactions across all asset classes, sourced from the Markets division of J.P. Morgan’s Corporate & Investment Bank. The analysis in this report is based on 120,000 spot and forward FX transactions in Swiss Francs (CHF), the Pound sterling (GBP), or the Mexican Peso (MXN) that were executed in the hours before, during, and after news broke for each event.
机构投资者在英国脱欧、美国大选和瑞士法郎底部的交易行为
在这份摩根大通研究所的报告中,我们研究了最近对外汇市场产生重大影响的三件事:瑞士国家银行于2015年1月15日决定结束其最低汇率政策,2016年6月23日的英国脱欧公投,以及2016年11月8日的美国总统大选。这三起事件都有一个重要的特点——它们都产生了意想不到的结果,导致相关汇率出现了近20年来最大的单日波动——这使它们成为旨在更好地理解机构投资者交易行为的研究的理想对象。考虑到这一研究目标,我们研究了机构投资者在每次事件发生前、期间和之后的外汇市场交易情况。首先,我们发现对冲基金、资产管理公司和银行的外汇交易量在这三次事件期间飙升。相比之下,企业、养老金/保险以及公共/其他投资者部门的交易量几乎没有增长。其次,机构投资者在事件期间交易了大量的外汇风险,但他们的净流量本身并不能解释在重新定价期间汇率的急剧波动。第三,只有对冲基金在新闻爆出和货币大幅重新定价后持续转移风险。其他投资者只有在汇率稳定后才转移风险。第四,活跃投资者在每次事件中都扮演着不同的角色:在瑞士央行事件期间,他们都买入瑞郎,跟随汇率的主流走势进行交易;在英国退欧期间,它们的净资金流喜忧参半;在美国大选期间,他们逆着汇率波动买入墨西哥比索。第五,在每个投资者部门中,每次事件期间的交易行为都有相当大的差异。最后,银行和对冲基金在正常营业时间之外、在一国货币所在市场之外的交易量增加;其他投资领域则没有。我们的研究结果对两个方面的政策讨论具有参考价值:金融市场稳定和央行沟通。该报告利用了一项新的数据资产,其中包括所有资产类别的近4亿笔机构投资者交易,数据来自摩根大通企业与投资银行市场部。本报告的分析基于12万笔瑞士法郎(CHF)、英镑(GBP)或墨西哥比索(MXN)的即期和远期外汇交易,这些交易是在每次事件发生之前、期间和之后的几个小时内执行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信