Tracing conceptual understandings and misunderstandings of science by students with and without vision impairment through a pilot study: the case of density and heat

V. Argyropoulos, Chris Yfantis
{"title":"Tracing conceptual understandings and misunderstandings of science by students with and without vision impairment through a pilot study: the case of density and heat","authors":"V. Argyropoulos, Chris Yfantis","doi":"10.52291/ijse.2021.36.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this pilot study was to describe and analyze the perceptions and alternative ideas of individuals with and without vision impairments regarding the concepts of “density” and “heat”. The perceptions of sighted, age- and gender-matched participants were compared with those of visually impaired participants (two groups). Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the analysis of the data followed the method of tracing and developing categories and sub-categories. The analysis revealed that the two groups held diverse understandings about “density”, while most participants seemed to identify “heat” as “temperature” and vice versa. The results are presented in the form of conception correlation matrices highlighting common concepts and alternative ideas towards the notions of “density” and “heat”. The findings demonstrate that in both groups there are common patterns of alternative ideas, which may lead to the assumption that vision loss or blindness and proficiency in science do not constitute a causal relation. The results may lead to useful implications for differentiated instruction regarding the comprehension of science in an integrated educational setting in conjunction with technological advances and inclusive practices.","PeriodicalId":280146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Special Education (IJSE)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Special Education (IJSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2021.36.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to describe and analyze the perceptions and alternative ideas of individuals with and without vision impairments regarding the concepts of “density” and “heat”. The perceptions of sighted, age- and gender-matched participants were compared with those of visually impaired participants (two groups). Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the analysis of the data followed the method of tracing and developing categories and sub-categories. The analysis revealed that the two groups held diverse understandings about “density”, while most participants seemed to identify “heat” as “temperature” and vice versa. The results are presented in the form of conception correlation matrices highlighting common concepts and alternative ideas towards the notions of “density” and “heat”. The findings demonstrate that in both groups there are common patterns of alternative ideas, which may lead to the assumption that vision loss or blindness and proficiency in science do not constitute a causal relation. The results may lead to useful implications for differentiated instruction regarding the comprehension of science in an integrated educational setting in conjunction with technological advances and inclusive practices.
通过一项试点研究,追踪有视力障碍和没有视力障碍的学生对科学概念的理解和误解:密度和热量的案例
本初步研究的目的是描述和分析视力障碍个体和非视力障碍个体对“密度”和“热”概念的感知和替代想法。将视力正常、年龄和性别匹配的参与者与视力受损的参与者(两组)进行比较。采用半结构化访谈,数据分析采用追踪发展类目和子类的方法。分析显示,两组人对“密度”有不同的理解,而大多数参与者似乎将“热”识别为“温度”,反之亦然。结果以概念相关矩阵的形式呈现,突出了对“密度”和“热量”概念的共同概念和替代概念。研究结果表明,在这两个群体中,存在着不同想法的共同模式,这可能会导致人们假设视力丧失或失明与精通科学并不构成因果关系。研究结果可能会对在综合教育环境中与技术进步和包容性实践相结合的科学理解的差异化教学产生有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信