Credit Scoring Using Ensemble Machine Learning

Ping Yao
{"title":"Credit Scoring Using Ensemble Machine Learning","authors":"Ping Yao","doi":"10.1109/HIS.2009.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we applied ensemble machine learning to evaluate credit scoring. With decision tree as the baseline algorithm, two popular ensemble learning methods, bagging and boosting, were evaluated across different experiment conditions: using all 14 features, using selected 6 features on Australian credit data form UCI data set. Results showed that in experiments with all features improved performance was achieved by ensemble learning. The best result was obtained in adaboost CART with 14 features, in which the overall correct rate increases from 83.25% to 85.86%.","PeriodicalId":414085,"journal":{"name":"2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS.2009.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this study, we applied ensemble machine learning to evaluate credit scoring. With decision tree as the baseline algorithm, two popular ensemble learning methods, bagging and boosting, were evaluated across different experiment conditions: using all 14 features, using selected 6 features on Australian credit data form UCI data set. Results showed that in experiments with all features improved performance was achieved by ensemble learning. The best result was obtained in adaboost CART with 14 features, in which the overall correct rate increases from 83.25% to 85.86%.
使用集成机器学习的信用评分
在本研究中,我们应用集成机器学习来评估信用评分。以决策树为基准算法,在不同的实验条件下对两种流行的集成学习方法bagging和boosting进行了评估:使用所有14个特征,使用从UCI数据集中选择的澳大利亚信用数据的6个特征。结果表明,在所有特征的实验中,集成学习可以提高性能。adaboost CART具有14个特征,结果最好,总体正确率从83.25%提高到85.86%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信