Variations of The Bilateral Barbell Squat: A Brief Review

Gabriel Illmeier, Nachwuchsleistungssportzentrum Steiermark, Illmeier G. Sports, Injr Med
{"title":"Variations of The Bilateral Barbell Squat: A Brief Review","authors":"Gabriel Illmeier, Nachwuchsleistungssportzentrum Steiermark, Illmeier G. Sports, Injr Med","doi":"10.29011/2576-9596.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The three most fundamental variations of the barbell squat with the bar placed on the shoulders are the high-bar back squat (HBBS), the low-bar back squat (LBBS), and the front squat (FS). There are significant kinematic, kinetic, and biomechanical distinctions between these variations that should be considered in the exercise selection. In comparison to the high-bar variations, the LBBS results in a greater hip joint torque and greater activation of the hip extensor muscles. In contrast, during the FS, the m. quadriceps is utilized more compared to the other two variations due to an increased torque in the knee joint. Regarding the relation between hip and knee joint torques, the HBBS is an intermediate and more balanced exercise variation than the LBBS and the FS. The HBBS is a fundamental exercise in athletic conditioning and a suitable starting point for novices, whereas the LBBS is preferred when the primary objective is to maximize weightlifting performance. The FS is crucial for athletes performing the clean and its derivates since it trains the required body position for a successful catch and might be the biomechanically advantageous variation if the goal is to target the knee extensor muscles. However, the differences in terms of knee extensor demands, muscle activation and kinematics between the HBBS and FS seem to be minimal, as the literature indicates similar results when comparing the FS to the HBBS. As far as analysis methods are concerned, even though 3D movement analysis is regarded as the gold standard for motion capture and analyzing kinematics, 2D models seem to serve as a valid initial guide in order to understand the kinematics and biomechanics of different squat variations.","PeriodicalId":162912,"journal":{"name":"Sports Injuries & Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Injuries & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2576-9596.100196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The three most fundamental variations of the barbell squat with the bar placed on the shoulders are the high-bar back squat (HBBS), the low-bar back squat (LBBS), and the front squat (FS). There are significant kinematic, kinetic, and biomechanical distinctions between these variations that should be considered in the exercise selection. In comparison to the high-bar variations, the LBBS results in a greater hip joint torque and greater activation of the hip extensor muscles. In contrast, during the FS, the m. quadriceps is utilized more compared to the other two variations due to an increased torque in the knee joint. Regarding the relation between hip and knee joint torques, the HBBS is an intermediate and more balanced exercise variation than the LBBS and the FS. The HBBS is a fundamental exercise in athletic conditioning and a suitable starting point for novices, whereas the LBBS is preferred when the primary objective is to maximize weightlifting performance. The FS is crucial for athletes performing the clean and its derivates since it trains the required body position for a successful catch and might be the biomechanically advantageous variation if the goal is to target the knee extensor muscles. However, the differences in terms of knee extensor demands, muscle activation and kinematics between the HBBS and FS seem to be minimal, as the literature indicates similar results when comparing the FS to the HBBS. As far as analysis methods are concerned, even though 3D movement analysis is regarded as the gold standard for motion capture and analyzing kinematics, 2D models seem to serve as a valid initial guide in order to understand the kinematics and biomechanics of different squat variations.
两侧杠铃深蹲的变化:简要回顾
杠铃深蹲的三个最基本的变化是高杠后蹲(HBBS),低杠后蹲(LBBS)和前蹲(FS)。这些变化在运动选择中应考虑到重要的运动学、动力学和生物力学差异。与高杠训练相比,LBBS会产生更大的髋关节扭矩和更大的髋关节伸肌激活。相反,在FS中,由于膝关节的扭矩增加,股四头肌比其他两种变型被更多地利用。关于髋关节和膝关节扭矩的关系,HBBS是一种中间的,比LBBS和FS更平衡的运动变化。HBBS是一项基本的运动训练,适合初学者,而LBBS是首选的,当主要目标是最大限度地提高举重成绩。FS对于运动员进行清洁动作及其衍生动作是至关重要的,因为它训练了成功接球所需的身体位置,如果目标是膝关节伸肌,它可能是生物力学上有利的变化。然而,HBBS和FS在膝关节伸肌需求、肌肉激活和运动学方面的差异似乎很小,因为文献表明,将FS与HBBS进行比较时,结果相似。就分析方法而言,尽管3D运动分析被认为是运动捕捉和运动学分析的黄金标准,但为了理解不同深蹲变化的运动学和生物力学,2D模型似乎可以作为有效的初始指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信