What is a feature?: a qualitative study of features in industrial software product lines

T. Berger, Daniela Rabiser, J. Rubin, P. Grünbacher, Adeline Silva, Martin Becker, M. Chechik, K. Czarnecki
{"title":"What is a feature?: a qualitative study of features in industrial software product lines","authors":"T. Berger, Daniela Rabiser, J. Rubin, P. Grünbacher, Adeline Silva, Martin Becker, M. Chechik, K. Czarnecki","doi":"10.1145/2791060.2791108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of features is commonly used to describe the functional and non-functional characteristics of a system. In software product line engineering, features often become the prime entities of software reuse and are used to distinguish the individual products of a product line. Properly decomposing a product line into features, and correctly using features in all engineering phases, is core to the immediate and long-term success of such a system. Yet, although more than ten different definitions of the term feature exist, it is still a very abstract concept. Definitions lack concrete guidelines on how to use the notion of features in practice. To address this gap, we present a qualitative empirical study on actual feature usage in industry. Our study covers three large companies and an in-depth, contextualized analysis of 23 features, perceived by the interviewees as typical, atypical (outlier), good, or bad representatives of features. Using structured interviews, we investigate the rationales that lead to a feature's perception, and identify and analyze core characteristics (facets) of these features. Among others, we find that good features precisely describe customer-relevant functionality, while bad features primarily arise from rashly executed processes. Outlier features, serving unusual purposes, are necessary, but do not require the full engineering process of typical features.","PeriodicalId":339158,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"135","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2791060.2791108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 135

Abstract

The notion of features is commonly used to describe the functional and non-functional characteristics of a system. In software product line engineering, features often become the prime entities of software reuse and are used to distinguish the individual products of a product line. Properly decomposing a product line into features, and correctly using features in all engineering phases, is core to the immediate and long-term success of such a system. Yet, although more than ten different definitions of the term feature exist, it is still a very abstract concept. Definitions lack concrete guidelines on how to use the notion of features in practice. To address this gap, we present a qualitative empirical study on actual feature usage in industry. Our study covers three large companies and an in-depth, contextualized analysis of 23 features, perceived by the interviewees as typical, atypical (outlier), good, or bad representatives of features. Using structured interviews, we investigate the rationales that lead to a feature's perception, and identify and analyze core characteristics (facets) of these features. Among others, we find that good features precisely describe customer-relevant functionality, while bad features primarily arise from rashly executed processes. Outlier features, serving unusual purposes, are necessary, but do not require the full engineering process of typical features.
什么是功能?对工业软件产品线特性的定性研究
特性的概念通常用于描述系统的功能性和非功能性特征。在软件产品线工程中,功能通常成为软件重用的主要实体,并用于区分产品线中的单个产品。正确地将产品线分解为功能,并在所有工程阶段正确地使用功能,是这种系统的即时和长期成功的核心。然而,尽管存在十多种不同的术语特征定义,但它仍然是一个非常抽象的概念。定义缺乏关于如何在实践中使用特征概念的具体指导。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了一个定性的实证研究,在实际工业特征的使用。我们的研究涵盖了三家大公司,并对23个特征进行了深入的、情境化的分析,这些特征被受访者认为是典型的、非典型的(异常值)、好的或坏的特征代表。使用结构化访谈,我们调查了导致特征感知的基本原理,并识别和分析了这些特征的核心特征(方面)。其中,我们发现好的特性精确地描述了与客户相关的功能,而坏的特性主要来自于草率执行的过程。异常特征,服务于不寻常的目的,是必要的,但不需要典型特征的完整工程过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信