A Systematic Review of Quality of Student Experience in Higher Education

Adrian Heng Tsai Tan, Birgit Muskat, A. Zehrer
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Quality of Student Experience in Higher Education","authors":"Adrian Heng Tsai Tan, Birgit Muskat, A. Zehrer","doi":"10.1108/ijqss-08-2015-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and synthezise major streams of research on quality of student experience in higher education, in order to present an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic review of high quality journals published during the period 2000 to 2014 in the areas of quality of student experience and higher education was performed.Findings: Findings highlight current research trends on the quality of student experience in higher education. Results show five prevailing research streams: 1) exploration of learning experience; 2) exploration of student experience; 3) gender differences in assessment of higher education experience; 4) improvement in quality of student experience, 5) student satisfaction with higher education experience.Research limitations/implications: The identification of the five research streams presented in the findings of this paper provide the basis for a synthesis of key issues identified within each research stream. These discussions, along with the identification of the purposes and limitations of existential research allow existential issues concerning research on quality of student experience in higher education to be addressed.Practical implications: Literature currently portrays the quality of student experience as a student-centric idea. Together with the purposes and limitations identified in existing research, the paper proposes an agenda for future research that increases the variety of research streams that is essential to provide a deeper understanding of the student experience to enhance the delivery of quality in higher education. Originality/value: The findings contribute to the research scene by providing important insights in terms of the current trends and focus of existing research in the area of quality of student experience in higher education.","PeriodicalId":269992,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Government Expenditures & Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-08-2015-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and synthezise major streams of research on quality of student experience in higher education, in order to present an agenda for future research. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic review of high quality journals published during the period 2000 to 2014 in the areas of quality of student experience and higher education was performed.Findings: Findings highlight current research trends on the quality of student experience in higher education. Results show five prevailing research streams: 1) exploration of learning experience; 2) exploration of student experience; 3) gender differences in assessment of higher education experience; 4) improvement in quality of student experience, 5) student satisfaction with higher education experience.Research limitations/implications: The identification of the five research streams presented in the findings of this paper provide the basis for a synthesis of key issues identified within each research stream. These discussions, along with the identification of the purposes and limitations of existential research allow existential issues concerning research on quality of student experience in higher education to be addressed.Practical implications: Literature currently portrays the quality of student experience as a student-centric idea. Together with the purposes and limitations identified in existing research, the paper proposes an agenda for future research that increases the variety of research streams that is essential to provide a deeper understanding of the student experience to enhance the delivery of quality in higher education. Originality/value: The findings contribute to the research scene by providing important insights in terms of the current trends and focus of existing research in the area of quality of student experience in higher education.
高等教育学生体验质量的系统评价
目的:本文的目的是识别和综合高等教育中学生体验质量的主要研究流,以便为未来的研究提出一个议程。设计/方法/方法-对2000年至2014年期间在学生体验质量和高等教育领域发表的高质量期刊进行了系统回顾。研究结果:研究结果突出了当前关于高等教育学生体验质量的研究趋势。研究结果显示五大研究方向:1)学习经验探索;2)学生体验探索;3)高等教育经历评价的性别差异;4)学生体验质量的提升;5)学生对高等教育体验的满意度。研究局限/启示:本文发现的五个研究流的确定为每个研究流中确定的关键问题的综合提供了基础。这些讨论,以及存在主义研究的目的和局限性的确定,使得有关高等教育学生体验质量研究的存在主义问题得以解决。实际意义:目前的文献将学生体验的质量描述为以学生为中心的理念。结合现有研究的目的和局限性,本文提出了未来研究的议程,以增加研究流的多样性,这对于深入了解学生体验以提高高等教育质量至关重要。原创性/价值:这些发现为高等教育学生体验质量领域的当前趋势和现有研究重点提供了重要见解,从而对研究领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信