Which Refactoring Reduces Bug Rate?

Idan Amit, D. Feitelson
{"title":"Which Refactoring Reduces Bug Rate?","authors":"Idan Amit, D. Feitelson","doi":"10.1145/3345629.3345631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a methodology to identify refactoring operations that reduce the bug rate in the code. The methodology is based on comparing the bug fixing rate in certain time windows before and after the refactoring. We analyzed 61,331 refactor commits from 1,531 large active GitHub projects. When comparing three-month windows, the bug rate is substantially reduced in 17% of the files of analyzed refactors, compared to 12% of the files in random commits. Within this group, implementing 'todo's provides the most benefits. Certain operations like reuse, upgrade, and using enum and namespaces are also especially beneficial.","PeriodicalId":424201,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Predictive Models and Data Analytics in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3345629.3345631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We present a methodology to identify refactoring operations that reduce the bug rate in the code. The methodology is based on comparing the bug fixing rate in certain time windows before and after the refactoring. We analyzed 61,331 refactor commits from 1,531 large active GitHub projects. When comparing three-month windows, the bug rate is substantially reduced in 17% of the files of analyzed refactors, compared to 12% of the files in random commits. Within this group, implementing 'todo's provides the most benefits. Certain operations like reuse, upgrade, and using enum and namespaces are also especially beneficial.
哪种重构能降低Bug率?
我们提出了一种方法来识别重构操作,以减少代码中的bug率。该方法基于比较重构前后特定时间窗口内的bug修复率。我们分析了来自1,531个大型活动GitHub项目的61,331个重构提交。当比较三个月的窗口时,17%的分析重构文件的bug率大大降低,而随机提交的文件的bug率为12%。在这个群体中,实现“待办事项”提供了最大的好处。某些操作,如重用、升级以及使用枚举和名称空间,也特别有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信