{"title":"States of consciousness, observer problem, cognition (or about the unity of transcendental psychology, physics and philosophy). Part I","authors":"Ruben M. Nagdyan","doi":"10.20323/1813-145x-2021-5-122-106-118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, there is an intensification of integration processes in science as a result of an increasing number of approaches and points of view on the same subject of research, leading to the convergence of sciences, creation of metatheories and interdisciplinary connections, thanks to the efforts of many researchers from different fields of science. In this context, the article attempts to show the unity of transcendental psychology, physics and philosophy in solving epistemological problems. The present article discusses the question of correspondence of the perceived or observed world with the world itself, with the world as it is «in reality». In connection with understanding of this issue, D. Berkeley, N. Bohr, W. Heisenberg, A. Einstein, A. N. Leontiev, A. I. Mirakyan’s views are being discussed. On the basis of the analysis carried out, the following assumption is made: the reason for insolubility of this problem within the framework of opposing philosophical directions is the discrepancy between levels and states of consciousness of representatives of these scientific directions. Dependence of the perception of the world and paradigm shifts on changes in the states of consciousness are shown. In the context of changes in states of consciousness, the issues of transcending and transitions from one reality to another are considered. A comparative analysis with the provisions of virtualistics is carried out. In the second part of the article, the features of external and internal observers and their relation to the process of cognition in the context of states of consciousness are going to be discussed.","PeriodicalId":122230,"journal":{"name":"Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20323/1813-145x-2021-5-122-106-118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Currently, there is an intensification of integration processes in science as a result of an increasing number of approaches and points of view on the same subject of research, leading to the convergence of sciences, creation of metatheories and interdisciplinary connections, thanks to the efforts of many researchers from different fields of science. In this context, the article attempts to show the unity of transcendental psychology, physics and philosophy in solving epistemological problems. The present article discusses the question of correspondence of the perceived or observed world with the world itself, with the world as it is «in reality». In connection with understanding of this issue, D. Berkeley, N. Bohr, W. Heisenberg, A. Einstein, A. N. Leontiev, A. I. Mirakyan’s views are being discussed. On the basis of the analysis carried out, the following assumption is made: the reason for insolubility of this problem within the framework of opposing philosophical directions is the discrepancy between levels and states of consciousness of representatives of these scientific directions. Dependence of the perception of the world and paradigm shifts on changes in the states of consciousness are shown. In the context of changes in states of consciousness, the issues of transcending and transitions from one reality to another are considered. A comparative analysis with the provisions of virtualistics is carried out. In the second part of the article, the features of external and internal observers and their relation to the process of cognition in the context of states of consciousness are going to be discussed.
目前,由于同一研究主题的方法和观点越来越多,导致科学的融合,元理论的创建和跨学科的联系,由于许多来自不同科学领域的研究人员的努力,科学中的整合过程正在加剧。在此背景下,本文试图展示先验心理学、物理学和哲学在解决认识论问题上的统一性。本文讨论了被感知或观察到的世界与世界本身,与“现实”中的世界的对应问题。在对这个问题的理解方面,正在讨论d.b leberl, N. Bohr, W. Heisenberg, A. Einstein, A. N. Leontiev, A. I. Mirakyan的观点。在进行分析的基础上,我们做出了以下假设:这个问题在对立的哲学方向框架内无法解决的原因是这些科学方向的代表在意识水平和意识状态上的差异。依赖性的感知世界和范式转移的变化,在意识状态显示。在意识状态变化的背景下,超越和从一个现实过渡到另一个现实的问题被考虑。并与虚拟化的规定进行了比较分析。在文章的第二部分,将讨论在意识状态的背景下,外部和内部观察者的特征及其与认知过程的关系。