Starost je i mirno more i nemirna luka: instrument za ispitivanje uverenja o starosti, starima i obrazovanju starih

J. Mišovič, Natalija Gojak, Z. Milošević
{"title":"Starost je i mirno more i nemirna luka: instrument za ispitivanje uverenja o starosti, starima i obrazovanju starih","authors":"J. Mišovič, Natalija Gojak, Z. Milošević","doi":"10.47152/ziksi2022032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientific and socio-political interest in the old age and the elderly is stimulated by the global trend of demographic aging of the population. There are many different social narratives available about the old age as a period of life, the elderly as a social category and the education intended for them, and all these narratives can be grouped into three approaches to the theory, practice and policy of elderly education: the concept of disengagement, the concept of expansive engagement and the concept of constructive and competent engagement. An instrument for examination of beliefs about the old age, elderly and elderly education was created, which is based on the theoretical premises of the aforementioned approaches. In order to examine the reliability of the created instrument, a pilot study was conducted on a sample of 40 andragogy students at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. The paper presents the results of a pilot study of the beliefs of andragogy students about the old age, elderly and elderly education, as well as the metric characteristics of the reliability of the created instrument. The instrument was revised based on the obtained research results and is presented at the end of the paper.","PeriodicalId":153260,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2022032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific and socio-political interest in the old age and the elderly is stimulated by the global trend of demographic aging of the population. There are many different social narratives available about the old age as a period of life, the elderly as a social category and the education intended for them, and all these narratives can be grouped into three approaches to the theory, practice and policy of elderly education: the concept of disengagement, the concept of expansive engagement and the concept of constructive and competent engagement. An instrument for examination of beliefs about the old age, elderly and elderly education was created, which is based on the theoretical premises of the aforementioned approaches. In order to examine the reliability of the created instrument, a pilot study was conducted on a sample of 40 andragogy students at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. The paper presents the results of a pilot study of the beliefs of andragogy students about the old age, elderly and elderly education, as well as the metric characteristics of the reliability of the created instrument. The instrument was revised based on the obtained research results and is presented at the end of the paper.
科学和社会政治对老年和老年人的兴趣受到全球人口老龄化趋势的刺激。关于老年作为人生的一段时期,老年人作为一个社会类别,以及针对他们的教育,有许多不同的社会叙事,所有这些叙事都可以归纳为老年教育理论、实践和政策的三种方法:脱离参与的概念,扩大参与的概念以及建设性和有能力参与的概念。以上述方法的理论前提为基础,创建了一种检验老年、老年和老年教育观念的工具。为了检验所创造的仪器的可靠性,对贝尔格莱德大学哲学系的40名性学学生进行了一项试验性研究。本文介绍了一项关于性学学生对老年、老年和老年教育的信念的初步研究结果,以及所创建的仪器可靠性的度量特征。根据所获得的研究结果,对仪器进行了修改,并在论文的最后给出了仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信