Revisiting the demographic history of Central African populations from a genetic perspective

Gwenna Breton, C. Fortes-Lima, Carina M. Schlebusch
{"title":"Revisiting the demographic history of Central African populations from a genetic perspective","authors":"Gwenna Breton, C. Fortes-Lima, Carina M. Schlebusch","doi":"10.47248/hpgg2101010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Africa is the continent of our species’ origin and the deep history of humans is represented by African genetic variation. Through genetic studies, it has become evident that deep African population history is captured by relationships among African hunter-gatherers and that the world’s deepest population divergences occur among these groups. In this review, we look back at a study published by Cavalli-Sforza and colleagues in 1969 entitled “Studies on African Pygmies. I. A pilot investigation of Babinga Pygmies in the Central African Republic (with an analysis of genetic distances)”. The study analyzed 19 classical polymorphisms and found that the deepest divergences in African populations were represented by hunter-gatherer groups such as the southern African San and the central African rainforest hunter-gatherers. We repeated the original analyses from Cavalli-Sforza et al. [1] with about 22 thousand times more genome-wide genetic markers in populations similar to those included in the original study. Our high-resolution analyses gave similar results regarding the relationships of early-diverging African populations compared to the classical polymorphism analyses. This finding, however, does not imply that research has stagnated and that developments in technology and genetic methods over the last fifty years delivered no additional information regarding African history and adaptation. We review how technology and population genetic methods have advanced to give more detailed inferences about population structure, migrations, admixture patterns, timing of admixture, sex-biased admixture, and inferences of selection and adaptive introgression in rainforest hunter-gatherers and other African populations. We also comment on how sequencing of ancient DNA has influenced findings and deliberate on the progress and development of more complex models of African history, including alternatives to tree-models and the inference of possible archaic admixture in African populations. We review the growing complexity of our picture of population history in central Africa and Africa as a whole, emerging from genomic studies and other disciplines investigating human population history and adaptation. While data and knowledge are accumulating, certain populations and areas remain underrepresented in genomic research. Their inclusion, possibly also through ancient DNA studies, together with new methods of analysis and the testing of representative models of deep population history in Africa, will help to build a more complete picture of past population history in Africa.\n\nBased on “Cavalli-Sforza LL, Zonta LA, Nuzzo F, Bernini L, de Jong WW, Meera Khan P, Ray AK, Went LN, Siniscalco M, Nijenhuis LE, van Loghem E, Modiano G. Studies on African Pygmies. I. A pilot investigation of Babinga Pygmies in the Central African Republic (with an analysis of genetic distances). Am J Hum Genet. 1969 May;21(3):252-274”.","PeriodicalId":393324,"journal":{"name":"Human Population Genetics and Genomics","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Population Genetics and Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47248/hpgg2101010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Africa is the continent of our species’ origin and the deep history of humans is represented by African genetic variation. Through genetic studies, it has become evident that deep African population history is captured by relationships among African hunter-gatherers and that the world’s deepest population divergences occur among these groups. In this review, we look back at a study published by Cavalli-Sforza and colleagues in 1969 entitled “Studies on African Pygmies. I. A pilot investigation of Babinga Pygmies in the Central African Republic (with an analysis of genetic distances)”. The study analyzed 19 classical polymorphisms and found that the deepest divergences in African populations were represented by hunter-gatherer groups such as the southern African San and the central African rainforest hunter-gatherers. We repeated the original analyses from Cavalli-Sforza et al. [1] with about 22 thousand times more genome-wide genetic markers in populations similar to those included in the original study. Our high-resolution analyses gave similar results regarding the relationships of early-diverging African populations compared to the classical polymorphism analyses. This finding, however, does not imply that research has stagnated and that developments in technology and genetic methods over the last fifty years delivered no additional information regarding African history and adaptation. We review how technology and population genetic methods have advanced to give more detailed inferences about population structure, migrations, admixture patterns, timing of admixture, sex-biased admixture, and inferences of selection and adaptive introgression in rainforest hunter-gatherers and other African populations. We also comment on how sequencing of ancient DNA has influenced findings and deliberate on the progress and development of more complex models of African history, including alternatives to tree-models and the inference of possible archaic admixture in African populations. We review the growing complexity of our picture of population history in central Africa and Africa as a whole, emerging from genomic studies and other disciplines investigating human population history and adaptation. While data and knowledge are accumulating, certain populations and areas remain underrepresented in genomic research. Their inclusion, possibly also through ancient DNA studies, together with new methods of analysis and the testing of representative models of deep population history in Africa, will help to build a more complete picture of past population history in Africa. Based on “Cavalli-Sforza LL, Zonta LA, Nuzzo F, Bernini L, de Jong WW, Meera Khan P, Ray AK, Went LN, Siniscalco M, Nijenhuis LE, van Loghem E, Modiano G. Studies on African Pygmies. I. A pilot investigation of Babinga Pygmies in the Central African Republic (with an analysis of genetic distances). Am J Hum Genet. 1969 May;21(3):252-274”.
从遗传角度重新审视中非人口的人口历史
非洲是人类起源的大陆,非洲的基因变异代表了人类的悠久历史。通过基因研究,我们可以清楚地看到,非洲狩猎采集者之间的关系反映了非洲人口的深层历史,世界上最深刻的人口差异发生在这些群体之间。在这篇综述中,我们回顾了Cavalli-Sforza及其同事在1969年发表的一项名为“非洲俾格米人研究”的研究。一、对中非共和国巴宾加俾格米人的试点调查(包括遗传距离分析)。该研究分析了19种经典的多态性,发现非洲人口中差异最大的是狩猎采集群体,如南部非洲的桑人和中部非洲雨林的狩猎采集群体。我们重复了Cavalli-Sforza等人的原始分析,在与原始研究相似的人群中使用了大约2.2万倍的全基因组遗传标记。与经典多态性分析相比,我们的高分辨率分析给出了关于早期分化非洲种群关系的类似结果。然而,这一发现并不意味着研究已经停滞不前,也不意味着过去50年来技术和遗传方法的发展没有提供关于非洲历史和适应的额外信息。我们回顾了技术和群体遗传方法的发展,以更详细地推断热带雨林狩猎采集者和其他非洲人群的群体结构、迁移、混合模式、混合时间、性别偏向混合以及选择和适应性渐渗的推断。我们还评论了古代DNA测序如何影响研究结果,并审议了更复杂的非洲历史模型的进展和发展,包括树模型的替代方案和非洲人口中可能的古代混合的推断。我们回顾了中非和整个非洲人口历史日益复杂的图景,这些图景来自基因组研究和其他研究人类人口历史和适应的学科。虽然数据和知识正在积累,但在基因组研究中,某些人群和地区的代表性仍然不足。包括它们,可能也通过古代DNA研究,加上新的分析方法和对非洲深层人口历史的代表性模型的测试,将有助于建立一个更完整的非洲过去人口历史的图景。基于《Cavalli-Sforza LL, Zonta LA, Nuzzo F, Bernini L, de Jong WW, Meera Khan P, Ray AK, Went LN, Siniscalco M, Nijenhuis LE, van Loghem E, Modiano G.非洲侏儒研究》1 .对中非共和国巴宾加俾格米人的试点调查(包括遗传距离分析)。[J] .热学学报。1969;21(3):252-274]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信