The Effects of Flipped Classrooms on English Composition Writing in an EFL Environment

Adrian Leis, Simon D. Cooke, Akihiko Tohei
{"title":"The Effects of Flipped Classrooms on English Composition Writing in an EFL Environment","authors":"Adrian Leis, Simon D. Cooke, Akihiko Tohei","doi":"10.4018/IJCALLT.2015100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors discuss the empirical results of a study comparing two English composition courses conducted with Japanese university students. One course was taught in a traditional way and the other using the flipped method. The results showed that those studying under the flipped method spent a significantly higher number of hours preparing for class t20 = 2.67, p =.014, d = 1.14 and produced a significantly higher number of words in compositions written in the posttest t10 = 3.37, p =.007, d = 1.44. The flipped method also appeared to result in significantly greater improvements in the writing proficiency of participants t32 = 5.17, p <.001, d = 1.15 and when using a one-way ANCOVA to make a comparison with the traditional method in the posttest F 1, 63 = 13.50, p <.001, ?2 =.18. The capability to view explanations of the text as many times as participants wished, as well as opportunities for direct and immediate individual feedback from the instructor for participants in the flipped group are discussed as possible reasons for the salient differences.","PeriodicalId":282169,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach.","volume":"123 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2015100103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

The authors discuss the empirical results of a study comparing two English composition courses conducted with Japanese university students. One course was taught in a traditional way and the other using the flipped method. The results showed that those studying under the flipped method spent a significantly higher number of hours preparing for class t20 = 2.67, p =.014, d = 1.14 and produced a significantly higher number of words in compositions written in the posttest t10 = 3.37, p =.007, d = 1.44. The flipped method also appeared to result in significantly greater improvements in the writing proficiency of participants t32 = 5.17, p <.001, d = 1.15 and when using a one-way ANCOVA to make a comparison with the traditional method in the posttest F 1, 63 = 13.50, p <.001, ?2 =.18. The capability to view explanations of the text as many times as participants wished, as well as opportunities for direct and immediate individual feedback from the instructor for participants in the flipped group are discussed as possible reasons for the salient differences.
翻转课堂对EFL环境下英语作文写作的影响
作者讨论了一项对日本大学生进行的两门英语作文课程比较研究的实证结果。一门课用传统的方式教授,另一门课用翻转教学法。结果显示,使用翻转教学法的学生在备课上花费的时间明显多于使用翻转教学法的学生。014, d = 1.14,并且在后测中产生的作文字数显著高于t10 = 3.37, p =。007, d = 1.44。翻转方法在参与者的写作能力上也有显著的提高(32 = 5.17,p <)。001, d = 1.15,当使用单向ANCOVA与传统方法进行后验比较时,F 1, 63 = 13.50, p <。001, ?2 =.18。根据参与者的意愿,可以多次查看文本解释的能力,以及教师对翻转小组参与者的直接和即时个人反馈的机会,作为显著差异的可能原因进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信