{"title":"The Effects of Flipped Classrooms on English Composition Writing in an EFL Environment","authors":"Adrian Leis, Simon D. Cooke, Akihiko Tohei","doi":"10.4018/IJCALLT.2015100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors discuss the empirical results of a study comparing two English composition courses conducted with Japanese university students. One course was taught in a traditional way and the other using the flipped method. The results showed that those studying under the flipped method spent a significantly higher number of hours preparing for class t20 = 2.67, p =.014, d = 1.14 and produced a significantly higher number of words in compositions written in the posttest t10 = 3.37, p =.007, d = 1.44. The flipped method also appeared to result in significantly greater improvements in the writing proficiency of participants t32 = 5.17, p <.001, d = 1.15 and when using a one-way ANCOVA to make a comparison with the traditional method in the posttest F 1, 63 = 13.50, p <.001, ?2 =.18. The capability to view explanations of the text as many times as participants wished, as well as opportunities for direct and immediate individual feedback from the instructor for participants in the flipped group are discussed as possible reasons for the salient differences.","PeriodicalId":282169,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach.","volume":"123 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2015100103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77
Abstract
The authors discuss the empirical results of a study comparing two English composition courses conducted with Japanese university students. One course was taught in a traditional way and the other using the flipped method. The results showed that those studying under the flipped method spent a significantly higher number of hours preparing for class t20 = 2.67, p =.014, d = 1.14 and produced a significantly higher number of words in compositions written in the posttest t10 = 3.37, p =.007, d = 1.44. The flipped method also appeared to result in significantly greater improvements in the writing proficiency of participants t32 = 5.17, p <.001, d = 1.15 and when using a one-way ANCOVA to make a comparison with the traditional method in the posttest F 1, 63 = 13.50, p <.001, ?2 =.18. The capability to view explanations of the text as many times as participants wished, as well as opportunities for direct and immediate individual feedback from the instructor for participants in the flipped group are discussed as possible reasons for the salient differences.
作者讨论了一项对日本大学生进行的两门英语作文课程比较研究的实证结果。一门课用传统的方式教授,另一门课用翻转教学法。结果显示,使用翻转教学法的学生在备课上花费的时间明显多于使用翻转教学法的学生。014, d = 1.14,并且在后测中产生的作文字数显著高于t10 = 3.37, p =。007, d = 1.44。翻转方法在参与者的写作能力上也有显著的提高(32 = 5.17,p <)。001, d = 1.15,当使用单向ANCOVA与传统方法进行后验比较时,F 1, 63 = 13.50, p <。001, ?2 =.18。根据参与者的意愿,可以多次查看文本解释的能力,以及教师对翻转小组参与者的直接和即时个人反馈的机会,作为显著差异的可能原因进行了讨论。