8 LAM Professionals and the Public Sphere

R. Audunson, H. Hobohm, M. Tóth
{"title":"8 LAM Professionals and the Public Sphere","authors":"R. Audunson, H. Hobohm, M. Tóth","doi":"10.1515/9783110636628-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of archives, libraries and museums is changing. During the last decades all three professional fields are witnessing profound paradigm changes. At least on a programmatic and theoretical level, New Librarianship, NewMuseology and New Archival Thinking are being developed (see for example Buschman 2003; Lankes 2011; Vergo 1989; McCall and Gray 2013; Ross 2015; Simon 2010; Huvila 2008; MacNeil and Eastwood 2017; Theimer 2018). In the light of digitalization and other global developments all three institutions revisit their role as platforms, increased participatory interaction with their potential communities and their effective mission in the society. The transformations in the digital society seem to foster similar changes in the three fields which are not only digital and not only technology triggered (Rasmussen 2019). They emphasise new roles beyond the mere information collection and dissemination function for all three of these institutions (Smiraglia 2014). In addition to the traditional roles of preserving and promoting the cultural heritage and being arenas for learning, there is an increased focus upon their role asmeeting places and arenas underpinning the public sphere with the mission of sustaining democratic values in societies (see for the field of libraries Buschman 2018; Hobohm 2019; Rivana Eckerdal 2017; Widdersheim and Koizumi 2016). How do professionals in the respective LAM fields perceive the challenges related to this new focus on their role asmeeting places and arenas for promoting the public sphere? We will investigate this question in this paper. Two trends are of particular importance regarding the topic of our research. One trend can be termed the social turn, Söderholm and Nolin’s (2015) assertion that we are in the middle of what they call the third community wave, the start of which dates from the turn of the century and continues to the present day. Klinenberg’s perspective on libraries as important parts of the social infrastructure can","PeriodicalId":341262,"journal":{"name":"Libraries, Archives and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libraries, Archives and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110636628-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The role of archives, libraries and museums is changing. During the last decades all three professional fields are witnessing profound paradigm changes. At least on a programmatic and theoretical level, New Librarianship, NewMuseology and New Archival Thinking are being developed (see for example Buschman 2003; Lankes 2011; Vergo 1989; McCall and Gray 2013; Ross 2015; Simon 2010; Huvila 2008; MacNeil and Eastwood 2017; Theimer 2018). In the light of digitalization and other global developments all three institutions revisit their role as platforms, increased participatory interaction with their potential communities and their effective mission in the society. The transformations in the digital society seem to foster similar changes in the three fields which are not only digital and not only technology triggered (Rasmussen 2019). They emphasise new roles beyond the mere information collection and dissemination function for all three of these institutions (Smiraglia 2014). In addition to the traditional roles of preserving and promoting the cultural heritage and being arenas for learning, there is an increased focus upon their role asmeeting places and arenas underpinning the public sphere with the mission of sustaining democratic values in societies (see for the field of libraries Buschman 2018; Hobohm 2019; Rivana Eckerdal 2017; Widdersheim and Koizumi 2016). How do professionals in the respective LAM fields perceive the challenges related to this new focus on their role asmeeting places and arenas for promoting the public sphere? We will investigate this question in this paper. Two trends are of particular importance regarding the topic of our research. One trend can be termed the social turn, Söderholm and Nolin’s (2015) assertion that we are in the middle of what they call the third community wave, the start of which dates from the turn of the century and continues to the present day. Klinenberg’s perspective on libraries as important parts of the social infrastructure can
LAM专业人士和公共领域
档案馆、图书馆和博物馆的作用正在发生变化。在过去的几十年里,这三个专业领域都见证了深刻的范式变化。至少在方案和理论层面上,新图书馆学、新博物馆学和新档案思维正在发展(例如,见Buschman 2003;平直的2011;枝条1989;McCall and Gray 2013;罗斯2015;西蒙2010;Huvila 2008;麦克尼尔和伊斯特伍德2017;Theimer 2018)。鉴于数字化和其他全球发展,这三家机构都重新审视了它们作为平台的作用,增加了与潜在社区的参与性互动,以及它们在社会中的有效使命。数字社会的变革似乎促进了这三个领域的类似变化,这些变化不仅是数字的,也不仅仅是技术引发的(Rasmussen 2019)。他们强调了这三个机构的新角色,而不仅仅是信息收集和传播功能(Smiraglia 2014)。除了保护和促进文化遗产以及作为学习场所的传统作用外,它们作为会议场所和支持公共领域的场所的作用越来越受到关注,其使命是维持社会中的民主价值观(参见图书馆领域,Buschman 2018;Hobohm 2019;Rivana Eckerdal 2017;Widdersheim and Koizumi 2016)。各个LAM领域的专业人士如何看待与他们作为促进公共领域的会议场所和舞台的新角色相关的挑战?我们将在本文中研究这个问题。关于我们的研究主题,有两个趋势特别重要。其中一个趋势可以被称为社会转向,Söderholm和Nolin(2015)断言,我们正处于他们所谓的第三次社区浪潮的中间,其开始时间可以追溯到世纪之交,一直持续到今天。Klinenberg认为图书馆是社会基础设施的重要组成部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信