Social Foundations in Exile: How Dare the School Build a New Social Order.

Brian W. Dotts
{"title":"Social Foundations in Exile: How Dare the School Build a New Social Order.","authors":"Brian W. Dotts","doi":"10.4324/9780203017609-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is society in process of becoming. Education is humanity on its knees, confessing the inadequacy of what has been. Education is humanity's effective aspiration for a world nearer every heart's desire. Education is the germ of transformation within the shell of the old, the unfolding and growth of the new, its flowering and its decline. --Goodwin Watson, The Social Frontier The ideals of education, whether men are taught to teach or to plow, to weave or to write must not be allowed to sink to sordid utilitarianism. Education must keep broad ideals before it, and never forget that it is dealing with Souls and not with Dollars. --W. E. B. Du Bois, The Negro Artisan What is Education? The Problem of Turning Answers into Questions In the first paragraphs of Democracy and Education, John Dewey differentiates \"between living and inanimate things.\" The latter, such as a stone, he argues, may be acted upon in such a way as to fragment its shape from without or, if the stone's \"resistance is greater than the force\" exerted upon it, the stone \"remains outwardly unchanged.\" On the other hand, \"while living things may easily be crushed by superior force, it none the less tries to turn the energies which act upon it into means of its own further existence.\" Dewey utilized this metaphor to distinguish between two types of learning: \"conservative,\" that which reproduces the status quo through cultural transmission and socialization (the stone that is acted upon), and \"progressive,\" wherein living things grow out of the conditions that gave them life by consciously directing \"the energies which act upon [them] into means of [their] own existence,\" for the purposes of experiencing \"growth\" and broadening \"potentialities\" (1944, p. 1, p. 41). These two purposes of education, often perceived as dichotomous, have existed since the Sophists' appeared in ancient Greece. (1) At bottom, they represent two diametrically opposed purposes of education: to control or to liberate. Dewey recognized this primordial schism during his own time. In 1934, he quoted Roger Baldwin, a founder and executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, who pointed out that teachers and students were being manipulated and objectified by external forces in order to maintain categorical support for existing social arrangements: \"The public schools have been handed over to\" reactionary groups, according to Baldwin, that were \"militant defenders of the status quo,\" including the \"the Daughters of the American Revolution, the American Legion, the Fundamentalists, the Ku Klux Klan, and the War Department\" (Dewey, 2011, p. 27). Dewey also criticized the implementation of \"compulsory patriotic rites,\" required Bible reading in schools, and teaching a doctrinaire knowledge of the Constitution. \"Three [American] states,\" he disparaged, made it \"a crime\" to teach \"evolution,\" and several more required \"loyalty oaths\" among \"students as a condition of graduation.\" He was appalled by the fact that teachers unions and tenure were under attack, all of which represented an atmosphere that he described as \"militant\" and formulaic. Unlike the inanimate rock that is objectified and acted upon in Dewey's Democracy and Education, teachers and students he believed must act within their given milieu \"to translate the desired ideal over into the conduct [and] detail of the school in administration ... and subject matter,\" so that schools could \"consciously\" reconstruct \"society\" (Dewey, 2011, p. 27, p. 29). Dewey and other social reconstructionists were attempting to penetrate America's long cultural resistance to intellectualism. They were defending and trying to validate what they believed was the essence of authentic education, inquiry stripped from, but not aloof to, its cultural, social, political, and economic veneers. Their attempts to critique existing institutions were characteristically met with contempt because critique threatened to fracture the existing socio-political system and rupture a deeply woven social fabric fashioned by and deeply laced with a conservative exceptionalism. …","PeriodicalId":125313,"journal":{"name":"Educational Foundations","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017609-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Education is society in process of becoming. Education is humanity on its knees, confessing the inadequacy of what has been. Education is humanity's effective aspiration for a world nearer every heart's desire. Education is the germ of transformation within the shell of the old, the unfolding and growth of the new, its flowering and its decline. --Goodwin Watson, The Social Frontier The ideals of education, whether men are taught to teach or to plow, to weave or to write must not be allowed to sink to sordid utilitarianism. Education must keep broad ideals before it, and never forget that it is dealing with Souls and not with Dollars. --W. E. B. Du Bois, The Negro Artisan What is Education? The Problem of Turning Answers into Questions In the first paragraphs of Democracy and Education, John Dewey differentiates "between living and inanimate things." The latter, such as a stone, he argues, may be acted upon in such a way as to fragment its shape from without or, if the stone's "resistance is greater than the force" exerted upon it, the stone "remains outwardly unchanged." On the other hand, "while living things may easily be crushed by superior force, it none the less tries to turn the energies which act upon it into means of its own further existence." Dewey utilized this metaphor to distinguish between two types of learning: "conservative," that which reproduces the status quo through cultural transmission and socialization (the stone that is acted upon), and "progressive," wherein living things grow out of the conditions that gave them life by consciously directing "the energies which act upon [them] into means of [their] own existence," for the purposes of experiencing "growth" and broadening "potentialities" (1944, p. 1, p. 41). These two purposes of education, often perceived as dichotomous, have existed since the Sophists' appeared in ancient Greece. (1) At bottom, they represent two diametrically opposed purposes of education: to control or to liberate. Dewey recognized this primordial schism during his own time. In 1934, he quoted Roger Baldwin, a founder and executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, who pointed out that teachers and students were being manipulated and objectified by external forces in order to maintain categorical support for existing social arrangements: "The public schools have been handed over to" reactionary groups, according to Baldwin, that were "militant defenders of the status quo," including the "the Daughters of the American Revolution, the American Legion, the Fundamentalists, the Ku Klux Klan, and the War Department" (Dewey, 2011, p. 27). Dewey also criticized the implementation of "compulsory patriotic rites," required Bible reading in schools, and teaching a doctrinaire knowledge of the Constitution. "Three [American] states," he disparaged, made it "a crime" to teach "evolution," and several more required "loyalty oaths" among "students as a condition of graduation." He was appalled by the fact that teachers unions and tenure were under attack, all of which represented an atmosphere that he described as "militant" and formulaic. Unlike the inanimate rock that is objectified and acted upon in Dewey's Democracy and Education, teachers and students he believed must act within their given milieu "to translate the desired ideal over into the conduct [and] detail of the school in administration ... and subject matter," so that schools could "consciously" reconstruct "society" (Dewey, 2011, p. 27, p. 29). Dewey and other social reconstructionists were attempting to penetrate America's long cultural resistance to intellectualism. They were defending and trying to validate what they believed was the essence of authentic education, inquiry stripped from, but not aloof to, its cultural, social, political, and economic veneers. Their attempts to critique existing institutions were characteristically met with contempt because critique threatened to fracture the existing socio-political system and rupture a deeply woven social fabric fashioned by and deeply laced with a conservative exceptionalism. …
流亡中的社会基础:学校如何敢于建立新的社会秩序。
教育是正在形成的社会。教育是人类跪在地上,承认过去的不足。教育是人类对一个更接近每个人内心渴望的世界的有效渴望。教育是旧事物外壳内变革的萌芽,是新事物的展开和成长,是它的盛衰。——古德温·沃森《社会边疆》教育的理想,无论教人们教书还是犁地,无论教人们织布还是写作,都绝不能让其沦为肮脏的功利主义。教育必须保持远大的理想,永远不要忘记它是在与灵魂而不是金钱打交道。- - - W。e·b·杜波依斯《黑人工匠:什么是教育?》在《民主与教育》一书的第一段中,约翰·杜威区分了“有生命的和无生命的事物”。他认为,后者,比如一块石头,可能会受到外力的作用,使其形状破碎,或者,如果石头的“阻力大于施加在它身上的力”,石头“保持外表不变”。另一方面,“虽然生物很容易被强大的力量摧毁,但它仍然试图把作用于它的能量转化为它自己进一步生存的手段。”杜威利用这个比喻来区分两种类型的学习:“保守的”,即通过文化传播和社会化(被作用的基石)来再现现状,以及“进步的”,其中生物通过有意识地将“作用于[它们]的能量转化为[它们]自身存在的手段”,从赋予它们生命的条件中生长出来,以体验“增长”和扩大“潜力”(1944,第1页,第41页)。教育的这两种目的,通常被认为是二分的,自古希腊的诡辩家出现以来就存在了。从根本上说,它们代表了教育的两个截然相反的目的:控制或解放。杜威在他自己的时代就认识到了这种原始的分裂。1934年,他引用美国公民自由联盟(American Civil Liberties Union)创始人兼执行董事罗杰·鲍德温(Roger Baldwin)的话,指出教师和学生被外部力量操纵和客观化,以保持对现有社会安排的绝对支持:根据鲍德温的说法,“公立学校已经移交给了”反动团体,这些团体是“现状的激进捍卫者”,包括“美国革命的女儿们,美国退伍军人协会,原教旨主义者,三k党和陆军部”(杜威,2011,第27页)。杜威还批评了“强制性爱国仪式”的实施,要求学校阅读圣经,并教授一种教条主义的宪法知识。“三个(美国)州”,他轻蔑地说,把教授“进化论”定为“犯罪”,还有几个州要求“学生宣誓效忠”,作为“毕业条件”。他对教师工会和终身教职受到攻击的事实感到震惊,所有这些都代表了一种他称之为“好战”和公式化的氛围。不像杜威的《民主与教育》中物化和行动的无生命的岩石,他认为教师和学生必须在给定的环境中行动,“将期望的理想转化为学校管理的行为和细节……这样学校就可以“有意识地”重建“社会”(Dewey, 2011, p. 27, p. 29)。杜威和其他社会重建主义者试图穿透美国长期以来对智识主义的文化抵制。他们捍卫并试图证实他们所认为的真正教育的本质,探究从文化、社会、政治和经济的表象中剥离出来,但并非超然。他们批判现有制度的尝试通常遭到蔑视,因为批判有可能破坏现有的社会政治制度,破坏由保守例外论塑造并深深融入其中的社会结构。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信