An expert-based cost estimation model for system test execution

B. Hauptmann, Maximilian Junker, S. Eder, Christian Amann, Rudolf Vaas
{"title":"An expert-based cost estimation model for system test execution","authors":"B. Hauptmann, Maximilian Junker, S. Eder, Christian Amann, Rudolf Vaas","doi":"10.1145/2600821.2600840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To execute system tests, two fundamentally different execution techniques exist: manual and automated execution. For each system test suite, one must decide how to employ those techniques (this strategy is called execution mode). Despite general conditions such as fixed testing strategies or development philosophies, almost all projects permit a wide range of possible execution modes to choose from. In industry, execution techniques are often chosen by experts based on rules of thumb, experience and best practices. Although the results are mostly tolerable, they may be not cost-effective. In retrospect, it is often unclear on what basis those decisions were made, making it difficult to assess whether they are still valid. Finally, it is hard to predict the costs for test execution beforehand. We introduce a cost model to estimate the economic impact of execution modes. Our cost model is based on expert estimations and gives additional input for testing experts in balancing pros and cons of execution modes at hand. Furthermore, it helps documenting and persists decisions during the life time of a test suite. Additionally, we report on a first case study, applying our cost model in industry.","PeriodicalId":296714,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600821.2600840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To execute system tests, two fundamentally different execution techniques exist: manual and automated execution. For each system test suite, one must decide how to employ those techniques (this strategy is called execution mode). Despite general conditions such as fixed testing strategies or development philosophies, almost all projects permit a wide range of possible execution modes to choose from. In industry, execution techniques are often chosen by experts based on rules of thumb, experience and best practices. Although the results are mostly tolerable, they may be not cost-effective. In retrospect, it is often unclear on what basis those decisions were made, making it difficult to assess whether they are still valid. Finally, it is hard to predict the costs for test execution beforehand. We introduce a cost model to estimate the economic impact of execution modes. Our cost model is based on expert estimations and gives additional input for testing experts in balancing pros and cons of execution modes at hand. Furthermore, it helps documenting and persists decisions during the life time of a test suite. Additionally, we report on a first case study, applying our cost model in industry.
基于专家的系统测试执行成本估算模型
要执行系统测试,存在两种根本不同的执行技术:手动执行和自动执行。对于每个系统测试套件,必须决定如何使用这些技术(这种策略称为执行模式)。尽管有诸如固定的测试策略或开发哲学之类的一般条件,但几乎所有的项目都允许广泛的可能的执行模式可供选择。在行业中,执行技术通常由专家根据经验、经验和最佳实践来选择。虽然结果大多是可以忍受的,但它们可能不具有成本效益。回顾过去,人们往往不清楚这些决定是根据什么做出的,因此很难评估它们是否仍然有效。最后,很难预先预测测试执行的成本。我们引入了一个成本模型来估计执行模式的经济影响。我们的成本模型基于专家的估计,并为测试专家提供了额外的输入,以平衡手头执行模式的优缺点。此外,它有助于在测试套件的生命周期内记录和持久化决策。此外,我们报告了第一个案例研究,将我们的成本模型应用于工业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信