Application of the Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) Framework in Pharmaceutical R&D: Results From a Pilot Program

R. Noel, R. Hermann, B. Levitan, D. Watson, K. Van Goor
{"title":"Application of the Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) Framework in Pharmaceutical R&D: Results From a Pilot Program","authors":"R. Noel, R. Hermann, B. Levitan, D. Watson, K. Van Goor","doi":"10.1177/0092861512458908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Benefit-risk (B-R) assessments inform decisions regarding drug development and lifecycle management, serve as a basis for regulatory determinations, and help clinicians, patients, and payers make rational, value-based treatment decisions. Nevertheless, no widely accepted, systematic methods exist to guide, justify, and communicate benefit-risk decisions in a transparent and consistent manner. The B-R Action Team (BRAT), formed by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), has developed a structured approach to B-R assessment—the “BRAT Framework”—that assists decision makers in selecting, organizing, summarizing, and communicating evidence relevant to B-R decisions. The BRAT Framework’s functionality has been demonstrated previously in a series of scenarios with hypothetical drugs as well as in a few real-world applications. Here we report results of a pilot program to assess the value of the Framework in pharmaceutical development and postmarketing settings, for the purpose of informing PhRMA’s regulatory advocacy. A third-party consultant conducted the assessment through a survey of pharmaceutical companies’ experiences using the Framework. We also identify aspects of the Framework that require further development.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512458908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Benefit-risk (B-R) assessments inform decisions regarding drug development and lifecycle management, serve as a basis for regulatory determinations, and help clinicians, patients, and payers make rational, value-based treatment decisions. Nevertheless, no widely accepted, systematic methods exist to guide, justify, and communicate benefit-risk decisions in a transparent and consistent manner. The B-R Action Team (BRAT), formed by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), has developed a structured approach to B-R assessment—the “BRAT Framework”—that assists decision makers in selecting, organizing, summarizing, and communicating evidence relevant to B-R decisions. The BRAT Framework’s functionality has been demonstrated previously in a series of scenarios with hypothetical drugs as well as in a few real-world applications. Here we report results of a pilot program to assess the value of the Framework in pharmaceutical development and postmarketing settings, for the purpose of informing PhRMA’s regulatory advocacy. A third-party consultant conducted the assessment through a survey of pharmaceutical companies’ experiences using the Framework. We also identify aspects of the Framework that require further development.
利益-风险行动小组(BRAT)框架在药物研发中的应用:来自试点项目的结果
获益-风险(B-R)评估为药物开发和生命周期管理决策提供信息,作为监管决定的基础,并帮助临床医生、患者和付款人做出理性的、基于价值的治疗决策。然而,目前还没有被广泛接受的、系统的方法来以透明和一致的方式指导、证明和交流利益风险决策。B-R行动小组(BRAT),由美国药物研究和制造商协会(PhRMA)组建,已经开发了一种结构化的B-R评估方法——“BRAT框架”——帮助决策者选择、组织、总结和交流与B-R决策相关的证据。BRAT框架的功能之前已经在一系列假设药物的场景以及一些实际应用中得到了证明。在这里,我们报告了一个试点项目的结果,以评估该框架在药物开发和上市后环境中的价值,目的是为PhRMA的监管倡导提供信息。第三方顾问通过调查制药公司使用该框架的经验进行了评估。我们还确定了该框架中需要进一步发展的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信