Chapter 11. Hybridity and antagonism in broadcast election campaign interviews

Argyro Kantara
{"title":"Chapter 11. Hybridity and antagonism in broadcast election campaign interviews","authors":"Argyro Kantara","doi":"10.1075/DAPSAC.80.11KAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present chapter contributes to existing research on hybridity in broadcast news interviews (Ekstrom 2011; Hutchby 2011a, 2011b, 2013, 2017; Baym 2005, 2013) both at a micro and a macro level. Employing Conversation Analysis on a micro level, it explores how, through their hybrid antagonistic practices, Greek politicians and journalists transform the broadcast election campaign news interview into an antagonistic arena where the winner is the one who shows that s/he plays the game of the news interview in a fair way. On a macro level, it examines how the antagonistic practices identified shape the knowledge produced for the overhearing audience (the epistemology of TV journalism in Ekstrom’s 2002 and Roth’s 2002 terms) in relation both to the politicians’ public portrayal and the resulting antagonistic politics foregrounded.","PeriodicalId":306737,"journal":{"name":"Doing Politics","volume":"28 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Doing Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/DAPSAC.80.11KAN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present chapter contributes to existing research on hybridity in broadcast news interviews (Ekstrom 2011; Hutchby 2011a, 2011b, 2013, 2017; Baym 2005, 2013) both at a micro and a macro level. Employing Conversation Analysis on a micro level, it explores how, through their hybrid antagonistic practices, Greek politicians and journalists transform the broadcast election campaign news interview into an antagonistic arena where the winner is the one who shows that s/he plays the game of the news interview in a fair way. On a macro level, it examines how the antagonistic practices identified shape the knowledge produced for the overhearing audience (the epistemology of TV journalism in Ekstrom’s 2002 and Roth’s 2002 terms) in relation both to the politicians’ public portrayal and the resulting antagonistic politics foregrounded.
第十一章。广播竞选采访中的混杂与对抗
本章对广播新闻采访中混杂性的现有研究做出了贡献(Ekstrom 2011;和记比2011a, 2011b, 2013, 2017;Baym 2005, 2013)在微观和宏观层面。在微观层面上运用对话分析,探讨了希腊政治家和记者如何通过他们的混合对抗实践,将广播竞选新闻采访转变为一个对抗的竞技场,在这个竞技场中,谁能公平地玩新闻采访游戏,谁就是赢家。在宏观层面上,它考察了确定的对抗性实践如何塑造了为无意倾听的观众产生的知识(埃克斯特罗姆2002年和罗斯2002年术语中的电视新闻认识论),这与政治家的公众形象和由此产生的对抗性政治前景有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信