Tax policy gap in southern African countries: Reflections on indirect tax coordination and tax diversity in SADC post Covid-19

P. Letete
{"title":"Tax policy gap in southern African countries: Reflections on indirect tax coordination and tax diversity in SADC post Covid-19","authors":"P. Letete","doi":"10.47348/jcla/v9/i2a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Southern African Development Community (SADC) tax policy on indirect tax coordination has mainly been guided by an approach toward the harmonisation of tax bases, the convergence of tax rates and the movement of taxes toward tax uniformity. This approach is one envisaged by the member states and reflected in Annex 3 of the Protocol on Finance and Investment. However, in recent studies, writers in this area opine that countries within a regional integration economic area (REC) should instead adopt an approach characterised by tax diversity of the indirect tax systems, as well as mutual coordination and cooperation to contribute towards economic integration. Recent literature proposes that tax coordination of indirect taxes must consider other options that move away from the uniformity of taxes, rates, and tax base. This paper considers this approach of placing tax diversity at the centre of the SADC tax policy of coordination of indirect taxes, particularly VAT and excise taxes. The paper reflects on the previous approaches that have characterised the implementation of the existing legal framework in tax coordination in the SADC and critically examines the implementation of the VAT and excise taxes guidelines and their significance in achieving tax coordination of indirect taxes. The article emphasises the importance of the SADC realising its goal of coordinating indirect taxes, particularly post Covid-19, due to the imminent need to raise more revenue from cross-border trade in the SADC member states to contribute toward the economic growth of member states.","PeriodicalId":377752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Law in Africa","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Law in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47348/jcla/v9/i2a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Southern African Development Community (SADC) tax policy on indirect tax coordination has mainly been guided by an approach toward the harmonisation of tax bases, the convergence of tax rates and the movement of taxes toward tax uniformity. This approach is one envisaged by the member states and reflected in Annex 3 of the Protocol on Finance and Investment. However, in recent studies, writers in this area opine that countries within a regional integration economic area (REC) should instead adopt an approach characterised by tax diversity of the indirect tax systems, as well as mutual coordination and cooperation to contribute towards economic integration. Recent literature proposes that tax coordination of indirect taxes must consider other options that move away from the uniformity of taxes, rates, and tax base. This paper considers this approach of placing tax diversity at the centre of the SADC tax policy of coordination of indirect taxes, particularly VAT and excise taxes. The paper reflects on the previous approaches that have characterised the implementation of the existing legal framework in tax coordination in the SADC and critically examines the implementation of the VAT and excise taxes guidelines and their significance in achieving tax coordination of indirect taxes. The article emphasises the importance of the SADC realising its goal of coordinating indirect taxes, particularly post Covid-19, due to the imminent need to raise more revenue from cross-border trade in the SADC member states to contribute toward the economic growth of member states.
南部非洲国家的税收政策差距:对新冠疫情后南部非洲发展共同体间接税协调和税收多样性的思考
南部非洲发展共同体(南部非洲共同体)关于间接税协调的税收政策的指导方针主要是统一税基、统一税率和使税收趋向统一。这是成员国的设想,反映在《金融与投资议定书》附件3中。然而,在最近的研究中,该领域的作者认为,区域一体化经济区域(REC)内的国家应该采用一种以间接税制度的税收多样性为特征的方法,以及相互协调与合作,以促进经济一体化。最近的文献提出,间接税的税收协调必须考虑远离税收、税率和税基统一的其他选择。本文考虑了这种将税收多样性置于南部非洲发展共同体间接税,特别是增值税和消费税协调税收政策中心的方法。本文反映了以前的方法,这些方法是南共体税收协调中现有法律框架实施的特征,并严格审查了增值税和消费税指导方针的实施及其在实现间接税税收协调方面的重要性。文章强调了南共体实现其协调间接税目标的重要性,特别是在新冠肺炎疫情后,因为迫切需要从南共体成员国的跨境贸易中筹集更多收入,以促进成员国的经济增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信