MTL and TPTL for One-Counter Machines

Shiguang Feng, Claudia Carapelle, O. Gil, Karin Quaas
{"title":"MTL and TPTL for One-Counter Machines","authors":"Shiguang Feng, Claudia Carapelle, O. Gil, Karin Quaas","doi":"10.1145/3372789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) and Timed Propositional Temporal Logic (TPTL) are quantitative extensions of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) that are prominent and widely used in the verification of real-timed systems. We study MTL and TPTL as specification languages for one-counter machines. It is known that model checking one-counter machines against formulas of Freeze LTL (FLTL), a strict fragment of TPTL, is undecidable. We prove that in our setting, MTL is strictly less expressive than TPTL, and incomparable in expressiveness to FLTL, so undecidability for MTL is not implied by the result for FLTL. We show, however, that the model-checking problem for MTL is undecidable. We further prove that the satisfiability problem for the unary fragments of TPTL and MTL are undecidable; for TPTL, this even holds for the fragment in which only one register and the finally modality is used. This is opposed to a known decidability result for the satisfiability problem for the same fragment of FLTL.","PeriodicalId":191685,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3372789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) and Timed Propositional Temporal Logic (TPTL) are quantitative extensions of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) that are prominent and widely used in the verification of real-timed systems. We study MTL and TPTL as specification languages for one-counter machines. It is known that model checking one-counter machines against formulas of Freeze LTL (FLTL), a strict fragment of TPTL, is undecidable. We prove that in our setting, MTL is strictly less expressive than TPTL, and incomparable in expressiveness to FLTL, so undecidability for MTL is not implied by the result for FLTL. We show, however, that the model-checking problem for MTL is undecidable. We further prove that the satisfiability problem for the unary fragments of TPTL and MTL are undecidable; for TPTL, this even holds for the fragment in which only one register and the finally modality is used. This is opposed to a known decidability result for the satisfiability problem for the same fragment of FLTL.
单计数器机器的MTL和TPTL
度量时间逻辑(Metric Temporal Logic, MTL)和时间命题时间逻辑(Timed Propositional Temporal Logic, TPTL)是线性时间逻辑(Linear Temporal Logic, LTL)的定量扩展,在实时系统验证中占有重要地位并得到广泛应用。我们研究了MTL和TPTL作为单计数器机器的规范语言。已知单计数器机的模型检验是否符合冻结LTL (FLTL)公式是不确定的,而冻结LTL是TPTL的严格分段。我们证明了在我们的设置中,MTL的表达性严格低于TPTL,并且在表达性上无法与FLTL相比,因此FLTL的结果并不暗示MTL的不可判定性。然而,我们表明,MTL的模型检查问题是不可确定的。进一步证明了TPTL和MTL的一元片段的可满足性问题是不确定的;对于TPTL,这甚至适用于只使用一个寄存器和finally模态的片段。这与同一片段FLTL的可满足性问题的已知可决性结果相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书