Analisis Komponen Koleksi Berdasarkan Instrumen Akreditasi Perpustakaan Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Islam

Sely Yoanda
{"title":"Analisis Komponen Koleksi Berdasarkan Instrumen Akreditasi Perpustakaan Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Islam","authors":"Sely Yoanda","doi":"10.24042/el-pustaka.v2i2.10071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the extent to which the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library prepares for library accreditation, especially in the collection component. The instrument used in this study is the university library accreditation instrument listed in the national library regulations of the Republic of Indonesia number 10 of 2018. The library collection component has 26 key indicators with a maximum weight of 20. This research method uses a descriptive quantitative approach. The technique of collecting data is through observation and structured interviews with the drafting team for the accreditation of the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library. The results showed that the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library based on the university library accreditation instrument was estimated to get a value of 13.7 out of a maximum weight of 20 for the collection component. This means that the preparation of the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library is still not optimal and must be improved again. The library of the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics has the potential to increase its accreditation value derived from 16 other indicators which include the availability of collection development policies, implementation of policies, surveys of collection needs, number of printed books, titles of reference books, subscribed scientific journals, subscribed electronic journals, addition of printed book collections, number of electronic book collections, audio visual collections, number of brochures, leaflets, pamphlets, posters, subscribed databases, processing standards, enumeration, fumigation, and improvement of library materials.","PeriodicalId":394626,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal El-Pustaka","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal El-Pustaka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/el-pustaka.v2i2.10071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the extent to which the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library prepares for library accreditation, especially in the collection component. The instrument used in this study is the university library accreditation instrument listed in the national library regulations of the Republic of Indonesia number 10 of 2018. The library collection component has 26 key indicators with a maximum weight of 20. This research method uses a descriptive quantitative approach. The technique of collecting data is through observation and structured interviews with the drafting team for the accreditation of the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library. The results showed that the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library based on the university library accreditation instrument was estimated to get a value of 13.7 out of a maximum weight of 20 for the collection component. This means that the preparation of the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics Library is still not optimal and must be improved again. The library of the Indonesian Institute of Business and Informatics has the potential to increase its accreditation value derived from 16 other indicators which include the availability of collection development policies, implementation of policies, surveys of collection needs, number of printed books, titles of reference books, subscribed scientific journals, subscribed electronic journals, addition of printed book collections, number of electronic book collections, audio visual collections, number of brochures, leaflets, pamphlets, posters, subscribed databases, processing standards, enumeration, fumigation, and improvement of library materials.
基于商业学院和伊斯兰信息学图书馆的认证工具对收集组件进行分析
这项研究的目的是确定印度尼西亚商业和信息研究所图书馆为图书馆认证准备的程度,特别是在收藏部分。本研究使用的仪器是2018年印度尼西亚共和国第10号国家图书馆条例中列出的大学图书馆认证仪器。图书馆馆藏组件有26个关键指标,最大权重为20。本研究方法采用描述性定量方法。收集数据的技术是通过观察和与印度尼西亚商业和信息研究所图书馆认证的起草小组进行有组织的面谈。结果表明,基于大学图书馆认证工具的印度尼西亚商业和信息研究所图书馆的收藏部分的最大权重为20,估计其价值为13.7。这意味着印度尼西亚商业和信息研究所图书馆的准备工作仍然不是最理想的,必须再次改进。印度尼西亚商业和信息学研究所的图书馆有潜力从其他16项指标中提高其认证价值,这些指标包括馆藏发展政策的可用性、政策的执行、对馆藏需求的调查、印刷书籍的数量、参考书籍的标题、订阅的科学期刊、订阅的电子期刊、增加的印刷书籍收藏、电子书籍收藏的数量、视听收藏、小册子、传单、小册子、海报、订阅数据库的数量、处理标准、枚举、熏蒸和图书馆资料的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信