Problem aspects of the state consistency of unrecognized polity in scientific research and political practice

A. Aseev, Marat Vernichenko, N. Sokolov, A. Turovsky, D. Filimonov
{"title":"Problem aspects of the state consistency of unrecognized polity in scientific research and political practice","authors":"A. Aseev, Marat Vernichenko, N. Sokolov, A. Turovsky, D. Filimonov","doi":"10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented article discusses the theoretical and methodological foundations of the category of state solvency (“state capacity”) of unrecognized polities. The specificity of the factors of state consistency on the case materials of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, the interdependence of the internal and external conditions of the viability of the authorities in ensuring the effective functioning of the state and society are shown, characteristic delegitimizing factors in the process of the formation of the new statehood are indicated. The article shows that assessments of the level of state consistency of developing and transitional countries, based on the criteria adopted in Western political science, are usually not always adequate due to the inconsistency of the category of consistency, as well as ideology and politicization used in Western political science. Low assessments of the quality of government and the solvency of the state itself can be used to discredit and delegitimize individual political regimes. It is concluded that the common criteria of solvency should be concretized and refined in relation to the historical, political and cultural characteristics of the countries in question. When analyzing new states, neoinstitutionalism is used in the article as the main methodological approach. The use of neoinstitutionalism, along with other political theories, makes it possible to perceive and interpret new polities as a self-sufficient state entity, in terms of their integrity, their inherent characteristics, needs and development trends. In the proposed article, the authors turn to the studies of foreign and domestic scientists in the field of the theory of state consistency, the legitimation of power (political scientists, lawyers, sociologists), to research on the functioning of government institutions in modern unrecognized states. Keywords–state consistency, legitimization, institutionalization, the post-Soviet space, polity, state education","PeriodicalId":129193,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presented article discusses the theoretical and methodological foundations of the category of state solvency (“state capacity”) of unrecognized polities. The specificity of the factors of state consistency on the case materials of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika, the interdependence of the internal and external conditions of the viability of the authorities in ensuring the effective functioning of the state and society are shown, characteristic delegitimizing factors in the process of the formation of the new statehood are indicated. The article shows that assessments of the level of state consistency of developing and transitional countries, based on the criteria adopted in Western political science, are usually not always adequate due to the inconsistency of the category of consistency, as well as ideology and politicization used in Western political science. Low assessments of the quality of government and the solvency of the state itself can be used to discredit and delegitimize individual political regimes. It is concluded that the common criteria of solvency should be concretized and refined in relation to the historical, political and cultural characteristics of the countries in question. When analyzing new states, neoinstitutionalism is used in the article as the main methodological approach. The use of neoinstitutionalism, along with other political theories, makes it possible to perceive and interpret new polities as a self-sufficient state entity, in terms of their integrity, their inherent characteristics, needs and development trends. In the proposed article, the authors turn to the studies of foreign and domestic scientists in the field of the theory of state consistency, the legitimation of power (political scientists, lawyers, sociologists), to research on the functioning of government institutions in modern unrecognized states. Keywords–state consistency, legitimization, institutionalization, the post-Soviet space, polity, state education
在科学研究和政治实践中不承认政体状态一致性的问题方面
本文讨论了未被承认的政策的国家偿付能力(“国家能力”)类别的理论和方法基础。国家一致性因素在Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika案例材料上的特殊性,当局在确保国家和社会有效运作方面的生存能力的内部和外部条件的相互依赖性,以及新国家形成过程中特有的非合法性因素。本文表明,基于西方政治学所采用的标准来评估发展中国家和转型国家的国家一致性水平,由于西方政治学所使用的一致性范畴的不一致性以及意识形态和政治化,通常并不总是足够的。对政府质量和国家自身偿付能力的低评估可以用来诋毁和剥夺个别政治制度的合法性。结论是,偿还能力的共同标准应根据有关国家的历史、政治和文化特点加以具体化和细化。在分析新国家时,本文将新制度主义作为主要的方法论方法。新制度主义与其他政治理论的运用,使得人们有可能从其完整性、内在特征、需求和发展趋势等方面,将新政体视为一种自给自足的国家实体。在拟议的文章中,作者转向国内外科学家在国家一致性理论、权力合法化领域的研究(政治科学家、律师、社会学家),研究现代未被承认的国家中政府机构的运作。关键词:国家一致性,合法化,制度化,后苏联空间,政体,国家教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信