Reflections on neo-Kaleckian growth regimes: a Marxian reproduction perspective

Feng Zhao, Jiahe Tian, Yuchen Duan
{"title":"Reflections on neo-Kaleckian growth regimes: a Marxian reproduction perspective","authors":"Feng Zhao, Jiahe Tian, Yuchen Duan","doi":"10.1108/cpe-11-2021-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe neo-Kaleckian model follows the ideas of Marx, Keynes and Kalecki, that investment is a key influencing factor in the dynamics of the capitalist mode of production. Through the discussion of different forms of investment decision function, this paper constructs the analysis framework of wage-led and profit-led economic growth regimes.Design/methodology/approachThe model has become an important theoretical paradigm for current Western heterodox economists regarding the research on the impact of functional income distribution on economic growth, and it has a very large impact on both theoretical and empirical research. Starting from Marx's reproduction theory, this article discusses the theoretical shortcomings of the neo-Kaleckian growth regime model.FindingsThis paper mainly focuses on three aspects: (1) the ideological legacy of “Smith's Dogma”; (2) neglecting the restrictions on income distribution from the organic composition of capital and the surplus value rate; (3) technological progress and the formation of a new long economic wave.Originality/valueThe authors believe that the neo-Kaleckian model unilaterally emphasizes the demand-side factors in the economy and, unconsciously or not, ignores the role of the supply-side, which makes it encounter certain limitations in explaining long-term growth. Even if some empirical conclusions are employed to bridge functional income distribution and technological progress, there is still a lack of a theoretical basis for accurately describing long-term economic changes using this model. In order to better promote high-quality economic development and accelerate the formation of a new pattern of economic development in which the domestic large-scale cycle is the mainstay and the domestic and international double cycles promote each other, the authors need to adopt a policy combination with the supply-side as the main and the demand-side as the supplement, and to work from both sides.","PeriodicalId":250696,"journal":{"name":"China Political Economy","volume":"28 2 Suppl 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cpe-11-2021-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe neo-Kaleckian model follows the ideas of Marx, Keynes and Kalecki, that investment is a key influencing factor in the dynamics of the capitalist mode of production. Through the discussion of different forms of investment decision function, this paper constructs the analysis framework of wage-led and profit-led economic growth regimes.Design/methodology/approachThe model has become an important theoretical paradigm for current Western heterodox economists regarding the research on the impact of functional income distribution on economic growth, and it has a very large impact on both theoretical and empirical research. Starting from Marx's reproduction theory, this article discusses the theoretical shortcomings of the neo-Kaleckian growth regime model.FindingsThis paper mainly focuses on three aspects: (1) the ideological legacy of “Smith's Dogma”; (2) neglecting the restrictions on income distribution from the organic composition of capital and the surplus value rate; (3) technological progress and the formation of a new long economic wave.Originality/valueThe authors believe that the neo-Kaleckian model unilaterally emphasizes the demand-side factors in the economy and, unconsciously or not, ignores the role of the supply-side, which makes it encounter certain limitations in explaining long-term growth. Even if some empirical conclusions are employed to bridge functional income distribution and technological progress, there is still a lack of a theoretical basis for accurately describing long-term economic changes using this model. In order to better promote high-quality economic development and accelerate the formation of a new pattern of economic development in which the domestic large-scale cycle is the mainstay and the domestic and international double cycles promote each other, the authors need to adopt a policy combination with the supply-side as the main and the demand-side as the supplement, and to work from both sides.
对新卡列奇增长体制的反思:马克思的再生产视角
新卡莱奇模型遵循马克思、凯恩斯和卡莱奇的观点,即投资是资本主义生产方式动态的关键影响因素。本文通过对不同形式的投资决策函数的讨论,构建了工资主导和利润主导经济增长机制的分析框架。该模型已成为当前西方非正统经济学家研究功能性收入分配对经济增长影响的重要理论范式,在理论和实证研究方面都具有非常大的影响。本文从马克思的再生产理论出发,探讨了新卡列奇增长制度模型的理论缺陷。研究结果主要集中在三个方面:(1)“斯密教条”的思想遗产;(2)忽略了资本有机构成和剩余价值率对收入分配的制约;(3)技术进步,形成新的长经济浪潮。原创性/价值作者认为,新卡莱肯模型片面地强调了经济中的需求侧因素,而有意无意地忽略了供给侧的作用,这使得它在解释长期增长时遇到了一定的局限性。即使采用了一些实证结论来架起功能性收入分配与技术进步之间的桥梁,但仍然缺乏使用该模型准确描述长期经济变化的理论基础。为了更好地促进经济高质量发展,加快形成以国内大周期为主体、国内外双周期相互促进的经济发展新格局,需要采取以供给侧为主、需求侧为辅的政策组合,双管齐下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信