Quality assurance for Monte Carlo risk assessment

Scott Ferson
{"title":"Quality assurance for Monte Carlo risk assessment","authors":"Scott Ferson","doi":"10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three major problems inhibit the routine use of Monte Carlo methods in risk and uncertainty analyses: correlations and dependencies are often ignored; input distributions are usually not available; and mathematical structure of the model is questionable. Most practitioners acknowledge the limitations induced by these problems, yet rarely employ sensitivity studies or other methods to assess their consequences. The paper reviews several computational methods that can be used to check a risk assessment for the presence of certain kinds of fundamental modeling mistakes, and to assess the possible error that could arise when variables are incorrectly assumed to be independent or when input distributions are incompletely specified.","PeriodicalId":298915,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Three major problems inhibit the routine use of Monte Carlo methods in risk and uncertainty analyses: correlations and dependencies are often ignored; input distributions are usually not available; and mathematical structure of the model is questionable. Most practitioners acknowledge the limitations induced by these problems, yet rarely employ sensitivity studies or other methods to assess their consequences. The paper reviews several computational methods that can be used to check a risk assessment for the presence of certain kinds of fundamental modeling mistakes, and to assess the possible error that could arise when variables are incorrectly assumed to be independent or when input distributions are incompletely specified.
蒙特卡洛风险评估的质量保证
三个主要问题阻碍了蒙特卡罗方法在风险和不确定性分析中的常规使用:相关性和依赖性经常被忽略;输入分布通常不可用;模型的数学结构也有问题。大多数从业者承认这些问题的局限性,但很少采用敏感性研究或其他方法来评估其后果。本文回顾了几种计算方法,这些方法可用于检查风险评估是否存在某些类型的基本建模错误,并评估当变量被错误地假设为独立或输入分布不完全指定时可能出现的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信