Evaluating the Impact of Reputation-Based Agents in Social Coalition Formation

C. Souza, F. Enembreck
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Reputation-Based Agents in Social Coalition Formation","authors":"C. Souza, F. Enembreck","doi":"10.1109/BRACIS.2016.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a dynamic and decentralized model for coalitional skill games (CSG). The model calculates and exploits the reputation of individuals connected by a network, as an alternative to the usual CSG approaches that require reward analysis for every possible coalition to determine an optimal coalition structure for maximizing the total reward from the community. In this study, we restrict the search space for partnerships to the social neighborhoods of agents so that the social capital is used to reach a near-optimal solution by identifying how reputation can be used to better adapt the network, with the objective of bringing together agents who are more likely to cooperate in successful coalitions. In addition, our model allows a more precise quantifying of the relevance of the agents over time in social coalition formation. Experiments with different initial network topologies show that our approach is significantly better than static networks or structure-based adaptations whenever the initial network does not fit a high degree of interconnectedness, such as in a small-world model. In all the cases, the results are statistically better than current adaptation strategies.","PeriodicalId":183149,"journal":{"name":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2016.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper proposes a dynamic and decentralized model for coalitional skill games (CSG). The model calculates and exploits the reputation of individuals connected by a network, as an alternative to the usual CSG approaches that require reward analysis for every possible coalition to determine an optimal coalition structure for maximizing the total reward from the community. In this study, we restrict the search space for partnerships to the social neighborhoods of agents so that the social capital is used to reach a near-optimal solution by identifying how reputation can be used to better adapt the network, with the objective of bringing together agents who are more likely to cooperate in successful coalitions. In addition, our model allows a more precise quantifying of the relevance of the agents over time in social coalition formation. Experiments with different initial network topologies show that our approach is significantly better than static networks or structure-based adaptations whenever the initial network does not fit a high degree of interconnectedness, such as in a small-world model. In all the cases, the results are statistically better than current adaptation strategies.
评价基于声誉的代理人在社会联盟形成中的影响
本文提出了一个动态分散的联盟技能博弈模型。该模型计算并利用由网络连接的个体的声誉,作为通常的CSG方法的替代方案,该方法需要对每个可能的联盟进行奖励分析,以确定最优的联盟结构,以最大化社区的总奖励。在本研究中,我们将合作伙伴关系的搜索空间限制在代理的社会社区,以便通过确定如何使用声誉来更好地适应网络,从而使用社会资本来达到接近最优的解决方案,目标是将更有可能在成功联盟中合作的代理聚集在一起。此外,我们的模型可以更精确地量化社会联盟形成过程中代理的相关性。不同初始网络拓扑的实验表明,当初始网络不适合高度互连时,例如在小世界模型中,我们的方法明显优于静态网络或基于结构的自适应。在所有情况下,统计结果都优于当前的适应策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信