Role Mining with Missing Values

Sokratis Vavilis, A. Egner, M. Petkovic, Nicola Zannone
{"title":"Role Mining with Missing Values","authors":"Sokratis Vavilis, A. Egner, M. Petkovic, Nicola Zannone","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2016.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years several organizations are migrating to Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) as a practical solution to regulate access to sensitive information. Role mining has been proposed to automatically extract RBAC policies from the current set of permissions assigned to users. Existing role mining approaches usually require that this set of permissions is retrievable and complete. Such an assumption, however, cannot be met in practice as permissions can be hard-coded in the applications or distributed over several subsystems. In those cases, permissions can be obtained from activity logs recording the actions performed by users. This, however, can provide an incomplete representation of the permissions within the system. Thus, existing role mining solutions are not directly applicable. In this work, we study the problem of role mining with incomplete knowledge. In particular, we investigate approaches for two instances of the role mining problem with missing values. Moreover, we study metrics to properly evaluate the obtained RBAC policies. We validate the investigated approaches using both synthetic and real data.","PeriodicalId":216417,"journal":{"name":"2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 11th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2016.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Over the years several organizations are migrating to Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) as a practical solution to regulate access to sensitive information. Role mining has been proposed to automatically extract RBAC policies from the current set of permissions assigned to users. Existing role mining approaches usually require that this set of permissions is retrievable and complete. Such an assumption, however, cannot be met in practice as permissions can be hard-coded in the applications or distributed over several subsystems. In those cases, permissions can be obtained from activity logs recording the actions performed by users. This, however, can provide an incomplete representation of the permissions within the system. Thus, existing role mining solutions are not directly applicable. In this work, we study the problem of role mining with incomplete knowledge. In particular, we investigate approaches for two instances of the role mining problem with missing values. Moreover, we study metrics to properly evaluate the obtained RBAC policies. We validate the investigated approaches using both synthetic and real data.
缺失值的角色挖掘
多年来,一些组织正在迁移到基于角色的访问控制(RBAC),作为规范对敏感信息访问的实用解决方案。角色挖掘被提议从分配给用户的当前权限集中自动提取RBAC策略。现有的角色挖掘方法通常要求这组权限是可检索的和完整的。然而,这样的假设在实践中是不可能实现的,因为权限可以在应用程序中硬编码或分布在多个子系统上。在这些情况下,可以从记录用户执行的操作的活动日志中获得权限。然而,这可能会提供系统内权限的不完整表示。因此,现有的角色挖掘解决方案并不直接适用。在这项工作中,我们研究了不完全知识的角色挖掘问题。特别地,我们研究了两个具有缺失值的角色挖掘问题的实例的方法。此外,我们还研究了适当评估获得的RBAC策略的指标。我们用合成数据和实际数据验证了所研究的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信