Plant and animal protein for muscle mass and strength gains: a systematic review

A. Meshtel, P. D. Rybakova, A. Miroshnikov, V. Vybornov, A. G. Antonov, R. Khanferyan, M. Korosteleva
{"title":"Plant and animal protein for muscle mass and strength gains: a systematic review","authors":"A. Meshtel, P. D. Rybakova, A. Miroshnikov, V. Vybornov, A. G. Antonov, R. Khanferyan, M. Korosteleva","doi":"10.47529/2223-2524.2022.4.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Controversial approaches to studying the effect of proteins of various origins on the functional parameters of human skeletal muscles have led to the erroneous opinion that plant-based protein is a lesser stimulator of muscle mass growth and muscle strength than animal protein. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to actually evaluate the effects of plant and animal protein intake on muscle mass and strength through studies comparing protein supplements.Methods: Literature search was carried out in the databases PubMed, Research Gate and the database of the Russian State Library. Studies were considered both in English and in Russian, over the past 20 years, filtered by date: from July 2002 to July 2022. Inclusion Criteria: Participants are healthy men and women over 18 years of age; taking protein supplements from plant products (soy, wheat, pea, rice, etc.); comparison with a group taking protein supplements from animal products (whey, beef, egg, etc.); studies assessed lean and/or muscle mass and assessed participants' muscle strength before and after supplementation; randomized controlled trial.Results: A total of 970 studies were found. After initial screening for title and abstract, 938 studies were excluded. Of the 32 publications selected, 5 duplicates were excluded, and after a secondary selection, 18 studies that did not meet the PICOS criteria were excluded. As a result of the search and selection, the review included 9 publications.Conclusions: Athletes and active individuals who prefer to consume plant-based protein products may not be inferior in terms of muscle strength and muscle mass to those athletes who prefer animal-based protein products. To further explore this topic, more randomized controlled trials should be conducted, taking into account the requirements for standardization and with a large number of participants.Registration: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022345245","PeriodicalId":309619,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine: research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine: research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47529/2223-2524.2022.4.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Controversial approaches to studying the effect of proteins of various origins on the functional parameters of human skeletal muscles have led to the erroneous opinion that plant-based protein is a lesser stimulator of muscle mass growth and muscle strength than animal protein. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to actually evaluate the effects of plant and animal protein intake on muscle mass and strength through studies comparing protein supplements.Methods: Literature search was carried out in the databases PubMed, Research Gate and the database of the Russian State Library. Studies were considered both in English and in Russian, over the past 20 years, filtered by date: from July 2002 to July 2022. Inclusion Criteria: Participants are healthy men and women over 18 years of age; taking protein supplements from plant products (soy, wheat, pea, rice, etc.); comparison with a group taking protein supplements from animal products (whey, beef, egg, etc.); studies assessed lean and/or muscle mass and assessed participants' muscle strength before and after supplementation; randomized controlled trial.Results: A total of 970 studies were found. After initial screening for title and abstract, 938 studies were excluded. Of the 32 publications selected, 5 duplicates were excluded, and after a secondary selection, 18 studies that did not meet the PICOS criteria were excluded. As a result of the search and selection, the review included 9 publications.Conclusions: Athletes and active individuals who prefer to consume plant-based protein products may not be inferior in terms of muscle strength and muscle mass to those athletes who prefer animal-based protein products. To further explore this topic, more randomized controlled trials should be conducted, taking into account the requirements for standardization and with a large number of participants.Registration: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022345245
植物和动物蛋白质对肌肉质量和力量的增加:一个系统的回顾
背景:研究各种来源的蛋白质对人类骨骼肌功能参数影响的争议性方法导致了一种错误的观点,即植物蛋白对肌肉质量生长和肌肉力量的刺激作用不如动物蛋白。因此,这项系统综述的目的是通过比较蛋白质补充剂的研究来评估植物和动物蛋白质摄入对肌肉质量和力量的影响。方法:在PubMed、Research Gate和俄罗斯国家图书馆数据库中进行文献检索。在过去的20年里,研究用英语和俄语进行,按日期筛选:从2002年7月到2022年7月。纳入标准:参与者为18岁以上的健康男性和女性;从植物产品(大豆、小麦、豌豆、大米等)中摄取蛋白质补充剂;与从动物产品(乳清、牛肉、鸡蛋等)中摄取蛋白质补充剂的组比较;研究评估了补充前后参与者的瘦肉和/或肌肉质量,并评估了他们的肌肉力量;随机对照试验。结果:共发现970项研究。在对题目和摘要进行初步筛选后,938项研究被排除在外。在入选的32篇文献中,排除了5篇重复文献,在二次入选后,排除了18篇不符合PICOS标准的研究。经过检索和筛选,本综述纳入了9篇文献。结论:喜欢食用植物蛋白产品的运动员和活跃人士在肌肉力量和肌肉质量方面可能并不逊于那些喜欢食用动物蛋白产品的运动员。为了进一步探讨这一问题,需要开展更多的随机对照试验,考虑标准化的要求,并有大量的参与者。报名号码:PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022345245
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信