It's no secret: measuring the security and reliability of authentication via 'secret' questions

Stuart Schechter, A. J. B. Brush, Serge Egelman
{"title":"It's no secret: measuring the security and reliability of authentication via 'secret' questions","authors":"Stuart Schechter, A. J. B. Brush, Serge Egelman","doi":"10.1145/1572532.1572580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All four of the most popular webmail providers ‐ AOL, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! ‐ rely on personal questions as the secondary authentication secrets used to reset account passwords. The security of these questions has received limited formal scrutiny, almost all of which predates webmail. We ran a user study to measure the reliability and security of the questions used by all four webmail providers. We asked participants to answer these questions and then asked their acquaintances to guess their answers. Acquaintances with whom participants reported being unwilling to share their webmail passwords were able to guess 17% of their answers. Participants forgot 20% of their own answers within six months. What’s more, 13% of answers could be guessed within five attempts by guessing the most popular answers of other participants, though this weakness is partially attributable to the geographic homogeneity of our participant pool.","PeriodicalId":273244,"journal":{"name":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1572532.1572580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

All four of the most popular webmail providers ‐ AOL, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! ‐ rely on personal questions as the secondary authentication secrets used to reset account passwords. The security of these questions has received limited formal scrutiny, almost all of which predates webmail. We ran a user study to measure the reliability and security of the questions used by all four webmail providers. We asked participants to answer these questions and then asked their acquaintances to guess their answers. Acquaintances with whom participants reported being unwilling to share their webmail passwords were able to guess 17% of their answers. Participants forgot 20% of their own answers within six months. What’s more, 13% of answers could be guessed within five attempts by guessing the most popular answers of other participants, though this weakness is partially attributable to the geographic homogeneity of our participant pool.
这不是什么秘密:通过“秘密”问题来衡量身份验证的安全性和可靠性
所有四个最流行的网络邮件提供商——AOL、Google、Microsoft和Yahoo!‐依赖于个人问题作为二级认证秘密用于重置帐户密码。这些问题的安全性受到了有限的正式审查,几乎所有这些审查都是在网络邮件之前进行的。我们进行了一项用户研究,以衡量所有四家网络邮件提供商使用的问题的可靠性和安全性。我们让参与者回答这些问题,然后让他们的熟人猜测他们的答案。参与者报告说,不愿与之分享网络邮箱密码的熟人能猜出17%的答案。参与者在六个月内忘记了20%的答案。更重要的是,13%的答案可以通过猜测其他参与者最受欢迎的答案在五次尝试中猜出来,尽管这种弱点部分归因于我们的参与者群体的地理同质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信