Geography of corporate innovation

Irina Ervits
{"title":"Geography of corporate innovation","authors":"Irina Ervits","doi":"10.1108/MBR-07-2017-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this paper is to identify major developments in corporate innovation. The author focuses on the behavioral differences between MNEs from developed and emerging markets in the way they locate their R&D activities. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nWith the help of descriptive statistics, the paper identifies major trends in the global distribution of innovative activity. The novel source of patent statistics, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications, is used as a proxy for innovative effort by leading MNEs. This paper is among the first attempts to analyze the global geography of innovation based on PCT statistics. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe analysis underscores differences in the patenting activities of MNEs from emerging and advanced markets. It confirms that innovative activity by major MNEs remains largely home-based, which contradicts the premise of the global nature of corporate innovation. At the same time, the growing importance of China as a research center attracts MNEs from a variety of developed markets. Emerging MNEs also file patent applications domestically. Most Chinese R&D subsidiaries of MNEs from advanced economies in our sample do not pursue technological specialization, as they produce patents in the same technological areas as the corporate headquarters or other subsidiaries. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nA number of assumptions about the innovation geography of major MNEs were empirically tested. An attempt was made to fill the gaps in our understanding of innovation strategies pursued by MNEs in emerging markets. The author uses the concept of MNEs as meta-integrators to explain the observed dynamics. Its explanatory power is more convincing as applied to our data than the concept of national systems of innovation.","PeriodicalId":108650,"journal":{"name":"The Multinational Business Review","volume":"276 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Multinational Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-07-2017-0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify major developments in corporate innovation. The author focuses on the behavioral differences between MNEs from developed and emerging markets in the way they locate their R&D activities. Design/methodology/approach With the help of descriptive statistics, the paper identifies major trends in the global distribution of innovative activity. The novel source of patent statistics, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications, is used as a proxy for innovative effort by leading MNEs. This paper is among the first attempts to analyze the global geography of innovation based on PCT statistics. Findings The analysis underscores differences in the patenting activities of MNEs from emerging and advanced markets. It confirms that innovative activity by major MNEs remains largely home-based, which contradicts the premise of the global nature of corporate innovation. At the same time, the growing importance of China as a research center attracts MNEs from a variety of developed markets. Emerging MNEs also file patent applications domestically. Most Chinese R&D subsidiaries of MNEs from advanced economies in our sample do not pursue technological specialization, as they produce patents in the same technological areas as the corporate headquarters or other subsidiaries. Originality/value A number of assumptions about the innovation geography of major MNEs were empirically tested. An attempt was made to fill the gaps in our understanding of innovation strategies pursued by MNEs in emerging markets. The author uses the concept of MNEs as meta-integrators to explain the observed dynamics. Its explanatory power is more convincing as applied to our data than the concept of national systems of innovation.
企业创新地理学
本文的目的是确定企业创新的主要发展。作者着重研究了发达市场和新兴市场跨国公司在研发活动定位方面的行为差异。在描述性统计的帮助下,本文确定了创新活动全球分布的主要趋势。专利统计数据的新来源——专利合作条约(PCT)申请——被用作领先跨国公司创新努力的代表。本文是基于PCT统计分析全球创新地理的首次尝试之一。分析强调了新兴市场和发达市场跨国公司专利活动的差异。报告证实,大型跨国公司的创新活动仍主要以本土为基础,这与企业创新具有全球性质的前提相矛盾。与此同时,中国作为研究中心的重要性日益提高,吸引了来自各种发达市场的跨国公司。新兴跨国公司也在国内提交专利申请。在我们的样本中,大多数来自发达经济体的跨国公司的中国研发子公司并不追求技术专业化,因为它们与公司总部或其他子公司在相同的技术领域生产专利。本文对主要跨国公司创新地理的若干假设进行了实证检验。本文试图填补我们对跨国公司在新兴市场所追求的创新战略的理解空白。作者使用跨国公司作为元整合者的概念来解释观察到的动态。它的解释力在应用于我们的数据时比国家创新体系的概念更有说服力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信