Interactive Technology to Aid Decision Making in Cardiac Care

Aleeha Iftikhar, R. Bond, V. Mcgilligan, A. McShane, A. Peace
{"title":"Interactive Technology to Aid Decision Making in Cardiac Care","authors":"Aleeha Iftikhar, R. Bond, V. Mcgilligan, A. McShane, A. Peace","doi":"10.1145/3335082.3335119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project aims to aid clinical decision making in cardiac care. Firstly, it will include a retrospective analysis of a PPCI referral dataset to identify patient referral patterns, decision making patterns and patient pathway variations as well as potential performance metrics that could be used in a dashboard. This will include a data mining approach using techniques such as anomaly detection and clustering to determine the patient archetypes and supervised machine learning to classify 30 day and one-year mortalities. This research will also assess the performance differential when using a paper-based form versus a smarter digital from, for example, how can a digital form improve the efficacy and usability in the context of PPCI. We will also assess the efficacy of different digital form designs and whether a multi-page form is more efficient when compared to a single page form. There is reason to hypothesize that a multi-page form is a better model, including the reduction in cognitive load and information as well as providing a sense of progression for the user. This research also intends to provide empirical HCI guidelines for the creation of digital forms and will build on previous work in the HCI community [1]. Guidelines are vital for providing informative best practices and for optimising the design and usability of digital forms and dashboards. We have found that there is a lack of adoption of interactive e technologies in the field of cardiac care and we hypothesise that interactive technologies can aid clinicians in improving decision making.","PeriodicalId":279162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"26 7-8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project aims to aid clinical decision making in cardiac care. Firstly, it will include a retrospective analysis of a PPCI referral dataset to identify patient referral patterns, decision making patterns and patient pathway variations as well as potential performance metrics that could be used in a dashboard. This will include a data mining approach using techniques such as anomaly detection and clustering to determine the patient archetypes and supervised machine learning to classify 30 day and one-year mortalities. This research will also assess the performance differential when using a paper-based form versus a smarter digital from, for example, how can a digital form improve the efficacy and usability in the context of PPCI. We will also assess the efficacy of different digital form designs and whether a multi-page form is more efficient when compared to a single page form. There is reason to hypothesize that a multi-page form is a better model, including the reduction in cognitive load and information as well as providing a sense of progression for the user. This research also intends to provide empirical HCI guidelines for the creation of digital forms and will build on previous work in the HCI community [1]. Guidelines are vital for providing informative best practices and for optimising the design and usability of digital forms and dashboards. We have found that there is a lack of adoption of interactive e technologies in the field of cardiac care and we hypothesise that interactive technologies can aid clinicians in improving decision making.
辅助心脏护理决策的交互式技术
本项目旨在帮助心脏护理的临床决策。首先,它将包括对PPCI转诊数据集的回顾性分析,以确定患者转诊模式、决策模式和患者路径变化,以及可以在仪表板中使用的潜在绩效指标。这将包括使用异常检测和聚类等技术的数据挖掘方法,以确定患者原型,并使用监督机器学习对30天和一年的死亡率进行分类。本研究还将评估使用纸质表单与更智能的数字表单时的性能差异,例如,数字表单如何在PPCI环境中提高效率和可用性。我们还将评估不同数字表单设计的有效性,以及与单页表单相比,多页表单是否更有效。有理由假设多页表单是一个更好的模型,包括减少认知负荷和信息,以及为用户提供一种进展感。本研究还打算为创建数字表单提供经验的HCI指南,并将建立在HCI社区先前的工作基础上[1]。指南对于提供信息丰富的最佳实践以及优化数字表单和仪表板的设计和可用性至关重要。我们发现,在心脏护理领域缺乏采用互动技术,我们假设互动技术可以帮助临床医生改善决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信