Spaces of Enslavement: A History of Slavery and Resistance in Dutch New York

L. Harris
{"title":"Spaces of Enslavement: A History of Slavery and Resistance in Dutch New York","authors":"L. Harris","doi":"10.1080/03612759.2023.2188747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"zying array of many different kinds of Northern areas scattered across the country—some suburban, many urban, and others in what would be more accurately described as the West or Midwest—a distinction she is careful to note. This is a critical contribution to literature on movements outside of the South and the attendant many dilemmas therein. This book is a needed addition to the work on Northern movements. By adding complexity to the debate, it further elucidates much of the groundwork laid by scholars such as Jeanne Theoharis, Komozi Woodard and Brian Purnell. But the stubborn issue of racism has always managed to surface in the North, and most often manifests itself in schooling. The tell of the deep-seated brand of racism that exists in the North—what jurists have called de facto segregation— often comes up in education. As Burkholder points out in example after example, particularly in suburban areas, Black students were often restricted to the one or two schools that were sometimes (although not always) in the Black parts of town. This also brings the question of periodization into the conversation. Any study that depicts Black separation will by necessity have to analyze struggles that predate Brown vs. Board. For instance, Burkholder spends a good part of the book talking about Boston, and for good reason. The bookends of Boston’s experiences with school desegregation take place not only in the 20th century, after Brown vs. Education, but began there in the 19th century. It is here where this study particularly shines, in its brilliant perception of the fact that there is never just one side to the school desegregation struggle, but was more often comprised of two sides and a differing philosophy—one that pushed for integration—and one that also saw the wisdom and practicality of working with the opportunity of building up Black education within an otherwise imperfect system. The book has five chapters, which are composed chronologically. One of the most interesting chapters is the one on school separation and Black Power which does an exceptionally good job of explaining how parents, children and families engaged in these campaigns, and incorporated older traditions of Black nationalism in the era of Black Power. The author carries that forward into the 1990s and early 2000s in the last chapter by taking a fascinating look at Afrocentric schools that came to embody many of the principles echoed earlier. In all of these ways, the book makes a substantial contribution to existing knowledge because of its unique framing—a dual study of integration and separation—which gives it the ability to portray these longstanding debates in new ways as a dilemma for African Americans to resolve. Burkholder’s work is a welcome addition to the scholarship on this area. Because there has never been anything quite like it before, it does not replace existing scholarship per se. Instead, it has instigated an entirely new line of inquiry. Although the book is written largely for a scholarly reading audience, it will be studied by scholars and lay people alike—perhaps offering a model for school districts in the North—still sorely in need of paradigms for successful examples of school integration. Burkholder offers these examples—in Montclair, New Jersey and Hartford, Connecticut—places that struck an essential balance between integration, the traditions of Black communities and the desires of the white community, blazing a path right through the dichotomy that is the “African American dilemma.”","PeriodicalId":220055,"journal":{"name":"History: Reviews of New Books","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History: Reviews of New Books","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03612759.2023.2188747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

zying array of many different kinds of Northern areas scattered across the country—some suburban, many urban, and others in what would be more accurately described as the West or Midwest—a distinction she is careful to note. This is a critical contribution to literature on movements outside of the South and the attendant many dilemmas therein. This book is a needed addition to the work on Northern movements. By adding complexity to the debate, it further elucidates much of the groundwork laid by scholars such as Jeanne Theoharis, Komozi Woodard and Brian Purnell. But the stubborn issue of racism has always managed to surface in the North, and most often manifests itself in schooling. The tell of the deep-seated brand of racism that exists in the North—what jurists have called de facto segregation— often comes up in education. As Burkholder points out in example after example, particularly in suburban areas, Black students were often restricted to the one or two schools that were sometimes (although not always) in the Black parts of town. This also brings the question of periodization into the conversation. Any study that depicts Black separation will by necessity have to analyze struggles that predate Brown vs. Board. For instance, Burkholder spends a good part of the book talking about Boston, and for good reason. The bookends of Boston’s experiences with school desegregation take place not only in the 20th century, after Brown vs. Education, but began there in the 19th century. It is here where this study particularly shines, in its brilliant perception of the fact that there is never just one side to the school desegregation struggle, but was more often comprised of two sides and a differing philosophy—one that pushed for integration—and one that also saw the wisdom and practicality of working with the opportunity of building up Black education within an otherwise imperfect system. The book has five chapters, which are composed chronologically. One of the most interesting chapters is the one on school separation and Black Power which does an exceptionally good job of explaining how parents, children and families engaged in these campaigns, and incorporated older traditions of Black nationalism in the era of Black Power. The author carries that forward into the 1990s and early 2000s in the last chapter by taking a fascinating look at Afrocentric schools that came to embody many of the principles echoed earlier. In all of these ways, the book makes a substantial contribution to existing knowledge because of its unique framing—a dual study of integration and separation—which gives it the ability to portray these longstanding debates in new ways as a dilemma for African Americans to resolve. Burkholder’s work is a welcome addition to the scholarship on this area. Because there has never been anything quite like it before, it does not replace existing scholarship per se. Instead, it has instigated an entirely new line of inquiry. Although the book is written largely for a scholarly reading audience, it will be studied by scholars and lay people alike—perhaps offering a model for school districts in the North—still sorely in need of paradigms for successful examples of school integration. Burkholder offers these examples—in Montclair, New Jersey and Hartford, Connecticut—places that struck an essential balance between integration, the traditions of Black communities and the desires of the white community, blazing a path right through the dichotomy that is the “African American dilemma.”
奴役的空间:荷兰纽约的奴隶制和抵抗史
许多不同类型的北部地区分散在全国各地——一些郊区,许多城市,还有一些更准确地说是西部或中西部——她仔细地指出了这一区别。这是对南方以外的运动和随之而来的许多困境的文学的重要贡献。这本书是关于北方运动的著作所必需的补充。通过增加辩论的复杂性,它进一步阐明了Jeanne Theoharis、Komozi Woodard和Brian Purnell等学者奠定的许多基础。但种族主义这一顽固问题一直在北方浮出水面,而且最常体现在学校教育方面。北方根深蒂固的种族主义——法学家称之为事实上的种族隔离——经常出现在教育中。伯克霍尔德举了一个又一个例子指出,尤其是在郊区,黑人学生往往被限制在一到两所学校里,而这些学校有时(尽管并非总是)位于城镇的黑人区。这也带来了周期化的问题。任何描述黑人分离的研究都必须分析布朗诉董事会案之前的斗争。例如,伯克霍尔德在书中用了很长的篇幅谈论波士顿,而且理由很充分。波士顿在学校废除种族隔离方面的经历不仅发生在20世纪布朗诉教育案之后,而且始于19世纪。这正是这项研究的亮点所在,它出色地认识到,学校废除种族隔离的斗争从来都不是单方面的,而更多的是由两方和不同的哲学组成——一方推动种族融合,另一方也看到了在一个不完善的体系中利用机会建立黑人教育的智慧和实用性。这本书有五章,按时间顺序排列。最有趣的章节之一是关于学校隔离和黑人权力的章节,它非常好地解释了父母、孩子和家庭是如何参与这些运动的,并在黑人权力时代融入了黑人民族主义的古老传统。在最后一章中,作者将这一观点延续到了20世纪90年代和21世纪初,他对非洲中心主义学校进行了引人入胜的研究,这些学校体现了前面提到的许多原则。在所有这些方面,这本书对现有知识做出了实质性的贡献,因为它独特的框架——对融合和分离的双重研究——使它能够以新的方式描绘这些长期存在的争论,作为非裔美国人需要解决的困境。伯克霍尔德的工作对这一领域的学术研究是一个值得欢迎的补充。因为之前从未有过类似的研究,所以它本身并不能取代现有的学术研究。相反,它发起了一条全新的调查路线。虽然这本书主要是为学术读者写的,但学者和非专业人士都将对其进行研究——也许可以为北方的学区提供一个模式——但仍然迫切需要学校整合的成功范例。伯克霍尔德举例说,在新泽西州的蒙特克莱尔和康涅狄格州的哈特福德,这些地方在融合、黑人社区的传统和白人社区的愿望之间取得了重要的平衡,为解决“非裔美国人困境”的二分法开辟了一条正确的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信