Assessment of Spark, Corona, and Plasma Ignition Systems for Gasoline Combustion

Sayan Biswas, Isaac W. Ekoto, D. Singleton, Kristapher Mixell, Ford Patrick
{"title":"Assessment of Spark, Corona, and Plasma Ignition Systems for Gasoline Combustion","authors":"Sayan Biswas, Isaac W. Ekoto, D. Singleton, Kristapher Mixell, Ford Patrick","doi":"10.1115/icef2020-3034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the present study, the performance and emissions characteristics of three low-temperature plasma (LTP) ignition systems were compared to a more conventional strategy that utilized a high-energy coil (93 mJ) inductive spark igniter. All experiments were performed in a single-cylinder, optically accessible, research engine. In total, three different ignition systems were evaluated: (1) an Advanced Corona Ignition System (ACIS) that used radiofrequency (RF) discharges (0.5–2.0 ms) to create corona streamer emission into the bulk gas via four-prong electrodes, (2) a Barrier Discharge Igniter (BDI) that used the same RF discharge waveform to produce surface LTP along an electrode encapsulated completely by the insulator, and (3) a Nanosecond Repetitive Pulse Discharge (NRPD) ignition system that used a non-resistor spark plug and positive DC pulses (∼10 nanoseconds width) for a fixed frequency of 100 kHz, with the operating voltage-controlled to avoid LTP transition to breakdown. For the LTP ignition systems, pulse energy and duration (or number) were varied to optimize efficiency. A single 1300 revolutions per minute (rpm), 3.5 bar indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) homogeneous operating point was evaluated. Equivalence ratio (ϕ) sweeps were performed that started at stoichiometric conditions and progressed toward the lean limit.\n Both the ACIS and NRPD ignition systems extended the lean limit (where the variation of IMEP < 3%) limit (ϕ = 0.65) compared to the inductive spark (ϕ = 0.73). The improvement was attributed to two related factors. For the ACIS, less spark retard was required as compared to spark ignition due to larger initial kernel volumes produced by four distinct plasma streamers that emanate into the bulk gas. For the NRPD ignition system, additional pulses were thought to add expansion energy to the initial kernel. As a result, initial flame propagation was accelerated, which accordingly shortens early burn rates.","PeriodicalId":379034,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2020 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference","volume":"14 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2020 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/icef2020-3034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the present study, the performance and emissions characteristics of three low-temperature plasma (LTP) ignition systems were compared to a more conventional strategy that utilized a high-energy coil (93 mJ) inductive spark igniter. All experiments were performed in a single-cylinder, optically accessible, research engine. In total, three different ignition systems were evaluated: (1) an Advanced Corona Ignition System (ACIS) that used radiofrequency (RF) discharges (0.5–2.0 ms) to create corona streamer emission into the bulk gas via four-prong electrodes, (2) a Barrier Discharge Igniter (BDI) that used the same RF discharge waveform to produce surface LTP along an electrode encapsulated completely by the insulator, and (3) a Nanosecond Repetitive Pulse Discharge (NRPD) ignition system that used a non-resistor spark plug and positive DC pulses (∼10 nanoseconds width) for a fixed frequency of 100 kHz, with the operating voltage-controlled to avoid LTP transition to breakdown. For the LTP ignition systems, pulse energy and duration (or number) were varied to optimize efficiency. A single 1300 revolutions per minute (rpm), 3.5 bar indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) homogeneous operating point was evaluated. Equivalence ratio (ϕ) sweeps were performed that started at stoichiometric conditions and progressed toward the lean limit. Both the ACIS and NRPD ignition systems extended the lean limit (where the variation of IMEP < 3%) limit (ϕ = 0.65) compared to the inductive spark (ϕ = 0.73). The improvement was attributed to two related factors. For the ACIS, less spark retard was required as compared to spark ignition due to larger initial kernel volumes produced by four distinct plasma streamers that emanate into the bulk gas. For the NRPD ignition system, additional pulses were thought to add expansion energy to the initial kernel. As a result, initial flame propagation was accelerated, which accordingly shortens early burn rates.
汽油燃烧的火花、电晕和等离子点火系统的评估
在本研究中,将三种低温等离子体(LTP)点火系统的性能和发射特性与使用高能线圈(93 mJ)感应火花点火器的传统策略进行了比较。所有的实验都在一个单缸,光学可及的,研究引擎中进行。总共评估了三种不同的点火系统:(1)先进的电晕点火系统(ACIS),该系统使用射频(0.5-2.0 ms)放电,通过四尖电极产生电晕流发射到气体中;(2)屏障放电点火器(BDI),该系统使用相同的射频放电波形,沿完全被绝缘体封装的电极产生表面LTP。(3)纳秒重复脉冲放电(NRPD)点火系统,该系统使用非电阻火花塞和正直流脉冲(约10纳秒宽度),固定频率为100 kHz,控制工作电压以避免LTP过渡到击穿。对于LTP点火系统,通过改变脉冲能量和持续时间(或数量)来优化效率。每分钟1300转(rpm), 3.5 bar表示平均有效压力(IMEP)均匀工作点进行评估。从化学计量条件开始进行等效比(ϕ)扫描,并向lean极限发展。与感应火花(φ = 0.73)相比,ACIS和NRPD点火系统扩展了精益极限(其中IMEP的变化< 3%)极限(φ = 0.65)。这种改善归因于两个相关因素。与火花点火相比,ACIS所需的火花延迟时间更少,这是由于四种不同的等离子体流带产生的初始核体积更大,这些流带散发到大块气体中。对于NRPD点火系统,额外的脉冲被认为可以增加初始核的膨胀能量。因此,最初的火焰传播被加速,这相应地缩短了早期的燃烧速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信